activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <>
Subject Re: STOMP and JMSType
Date Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:08:46 GMT

On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> So here's a link to everything that is in the spec currently:
> It's a WIKI so you can edit it and improve the spec.  I think that a
> the big missing piece in the spec is that there is no specification of
> how STOMP messages get mapped to JMS messages.  Since this is missing,
> there is no provider independent way of sending JMS messages from
> STOMP.  Since every implementation could map a STOMP message to JMS
> messages differently.
> I think we need to add a "STOMP Message to JMS Message Mapping"
> section that providers SHOULD comply with if the provider also
> implements a JMS interface.  The great part is since this is missing,
> you can make this whatever you want!

Appendix, not part of the spec itself. If for no other reason than  
ActiveMQ will not be compliant as the current hackjob I implemented  
and we are now discussing how to fix is definitely not spec-worthy =)

Once we have a few implementations and people have worked with it we  
can consider moving it from appendix into stomp 1.1 proper.  
Enshrining one technique now would be like enshrining a set of rules  
for O/R mapping eight years ago.


View raw message