Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77965 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 88479 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 88445 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 88436 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:55:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.25.178.46] (HELO mx03.lexisnexis.com) (207.25.178.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:55:22 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.lexis-nexis.com ([138.12.44.45]) by mx03.lexisnexis.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2006 13:55:01 -0400 Received: from lngdayexcp001.legal.regn.net (smtpgate.lexis-nexis.com [10.113.1.1]) by mailgate2.lexis-nexis.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3JHrPt7000697 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:54:59 -0400 Received: from LNGDAYEXCP01VA.legal.regn.net ([10.113.1.3]) by lngdayexcp001.legal.regn.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:54:55 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:54:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: openwire-cpp question Thread-Index: AcZj2fz0MC9/NJSXR8CPVg3mMMlH5AAAC7vQ From: "Dhawan, Vikram \(LNG-DAY\)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Apr 2006 17:54:55.0887 (UTC) FILETIME=[5E1199F0:01C663DA] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 138.12.44.45 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Hiram,=20 Thanks for the heads up. Can you please tell me where I can find your = updated c client?=20 David: are you planning to incorporate these changes in your code soon? Thanks! Vik -----Original Message----- From: chirino@gmail.com [mailto:chirino@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hiram = Chirino Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:51 PM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: openwire-cpp question On 4/19/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) = wrote: > Hey David, > > I was able to build this code on Sun Workshop 8, I had to put some OS = dependant condition checks, like you have for MACOS and have to modify = code a little bit here and there nothing major. > > I am able to run it with AMQ-RC2 but when I tried to run it with = latest SNAPSHOT (04/18) it was getting stuck after receiving BROKER_INFO = command. > Wireformat may have changed a little.. perhaps we need to regenerate the openwire marshaller for c++ > I am not sure if latest SNAPSHOT is having issues because I had the = same problem with the STOMP C client it was getting stuck after sending = the SUB command. > There's been a small change to the stomp marshal ling. Before we were inconsistently adding \n after the \0 frame terminator. So I changed the activemq side to all ways consistently add the \n after the frame. It also expects frames that are sent to it to also have the \n. I could rollback the requirement for frames that it receive have a \n, but I think it would be better if the stomp protocol was a bit more consistent and just did things 1 way. So this could be what has broken some of the stomp clients. I've updated the c and ruby ones so that they work once again. > Thanks! > > Vik > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fahlander [mailto:David.Fahlander@portwise.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:03 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > This code compiles and runs on GCC 3, GCC 4 and Visual Studio 2005. We = have never tried to compile it with Sun compiler. The code is tested and = can communicate with text messages with the broker (as our test code = does). > > Hope to get the time to make the code compile with more C++ compilers = as soon as we get to a point where the code becomes complete. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:vikram.dhawan@lexisnexis.com] > Sent: den 18 april 2006 23:37 > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > Hi David, > > I tried that code earlier and ran in to build issues, there are lots = of things in this code what Sun Compiler didn't liked. Is this code = tested? > > Thanks! > > Vik > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fahlander [mailto:David.Fahlander@portwise.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:55 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Cc: Mats Forsl=F6f > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > The latest code is of the openwire cpp client was uploaded as a jira = patch at http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-656. The latest = version is called "source 060406.zip". It contains the full source tree = as well as make files and a test program. > > /David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:nathan.mittler@sensis.com] > Sent: den 17 april 2006 17:28 > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Cc: Mats Forsl=F6f > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > Hi Mats, > Is the code in svn your latest? I remember you including unit tests = and > makefiles at some point - did these get lost when the last patch was > applied? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:vikram.dhawan@lexisnexis.com] > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:08 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > There is no test stub either. I am wondering if someone ever tested = it? > > Vik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:nathan.mittler@sensis.com] > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:01 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > Hmm ... that surprises me - I know the openwire-cpp team had included > makefiles in the past. I believe the code should support linux, > windows, & OSX. > > Does anyone know where the makefiles are? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:vikram.dhawan@lexisnexis.com] > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:08 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > Hey Nate, > > I don't see any make file or something in there? Do you have any idea > what O/S version and C++ complier this code recommends? > > Thanks! > > Vik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Mittler [mailto:nathan.mittler@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:16 AM > To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: Re: openwire-cpp question > > The latter - It's a client-side library. The same is true for the = Stomp > CMS > lib and the openwire .NET lib. > > Regards, > Nate > > On 4/16/06, vik Dhawan wrote: > > > > > > I wanted to know the use of Development branch on SVN at > > = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cpp/ > > > > Is this a C++ implementation of ActiveMQ? is it complete? or is it = can > be > > used as a C++ library so some application can use classes in this > library > > to > > connect to a remote AMQ server? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/openwire-cpp-question-t1459989.html#a3945792 > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- Regards, Hiram