activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Larrieu, Christopher" <clarr...@amazon.com>
Subject RE: Avoid blocking producers
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:25:59 GMT
Great!  But what exactly does "side-by-side" mean?  Does this imply that whatever changes you
make will be swappable with existing code?  Are there any design documents that we can review
in order to understand how your improvements will affect our goals and/or meet our needs?

Thanks,

Chris 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdavies@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:34 AM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Avoid blocking producers
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> we are planning on prototyping this for 4.1 and will do this 
> side-by- side to the existing implementation. We should have 
> the first cut implemented in the next  couple of months - but 
> any contributions are welcome!
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Rob
> 
> On 27 Apr 2006, at 23:32, Larrieu, Christopher wrote:
> 
> > Rob,
> >
> > In response to JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/
> > AMQ-688#action_36051 you mentioned that you are looking into some 
> > major changes for decoupling producers and consumers, as well as 
> > implementing the staged feeding of dispatch queues.  Much of this 
> > coincides with work that we need in order to use ActiveMQ 
> effectively 
> > in our organization.  If we were to move forward 
> independently without 
> > collaborating, we'd end up arriving with wildly divergent results.
> >
> > Can you provide some more details, so that we can plan accordingly?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message