activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell" <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ and ServiceMix reports
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:34:42 GMT
Modifying the workflow slightly from my shoe-in assumption:

1) Remove all committers who have not contributed to the project while
it was under Incubation.If they were new committers, remove their
Apache accounts etc (well, freeze them - whatever).
2) Graduate into target, with PPMC members becoming PMC members.

I can see that there is a thin grey line in which you might have
someone who is not yet a trusted committer (recently added to the
project), but "getting the ASF" isn't usually somthing that is
required to be on a PMC, that's something I hear used much more when
discussing ASF membership.

If, after N months/years in incubation, someone has not shown that
they are a trusted committer - then they shouldn't be committers going
forward.

[which I think covers my reply to Ken's email on the subject too]

Hen

On 3/15/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Henri,
>
> I think a good example of why not just a shoe in is because when the
> ServiceMix and ActiveMQ apache commiter list was created, it included
> all previous commiters to the project.  But 100% of committers may not
> have been active during the period of the incubation.  All though the
> projects trusted those individuals enough in the past to give them
> commit privileges, perhaps the TLP PMC may want to see more recent
> activity to evaluate if they truly 'get' the Apache way.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> On 3/15/06, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/15/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Noel,
> > >
> > > If the ActiveMQ / ServiceMix community do decide to go under some
> > > other TLP,  I'm sure it would not take long for the active
> > > participants of the community to asked to Join the TLP's PMC.  It
> > > would behoove that PMC to include such active community participants
> > > in the decision making proccess.
> >
> > Interesting reply - I'd been assuming that when an incubatee graduates
> > into an existing project, it's PPMC automatically get added to the
> > PMC. So I was a bit confused as to why Noel was even asking the
> > question.
> >
> > > Furthermore, I believe that merging ActiveMQ and Servicemix into
> > > Geronimo community and PMC is easier than most cases since there are
> > > all ready several active ActiveMQ/ServiceMix commiters thar are
> > > Geronimo PMC members.  Those PMC memebers can help propose and vouch
> > > for additional commiters to join the PMC.
> >
> > Yeah, overlap would help. Still surprised that it's not just a shoe-in.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message