Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=PnKDR5rqqgv9TLOil0c1Wh2lI7KbMJScvUuizn9AYZ1K4f7B3HLNg49EdE8xv/te+B6oeJvM1D2BXcCb1rf4YoXLYX5AdJB6qvLCU85cJj9csFFAOPOaU29JR3dxlDE/mRxqLMq8fZyoyooi461rQ2o7r8NxRpnUG6jZtyW6w5g=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: 
 <221951ED658AA34D935E2B5FB6934920CB1FEF@stosrv-exchange.portwise.com>
References: 
 <221951ED658AA34D935E2B5FB6934920CB1FEF@stosrv-exchange.portwise.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <DF530715-9953-4785-B73D-473049FF38C3@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Patch: C++ client
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:33:09 +0000
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org

On 24 Feb 2006, at 08:30, Mats Forsl=F6f wrote:
> Having the same troubles again sending a patch to the mailing list, =20=

> should I upload it somewhere else or what is the right procedure?

Sorry about that - Apache mail lists limit email size. I wonder could =20=

you attach it to a JIRA issue and post a URL? Many thanks!

BTW I've got the C# client working now - will explain all in a few =20
hours, so I should be in a good position to auto-create the =20
marshalling code for C++ now.

James

>
> Mats
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mats Forsl=F6f [mailto:Mats.Forslof@portwise.com]
> Sent: den 24 februari 2006 09:28
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Patch: C++ client
>
>
> Attached is a patch with numerous improvements as well as added =20
> support for Map and Bytes messages. All classes within the =20
> ActiveMQDestination tree is more complete since they are manually =20
> maintained in the command hierarchy.
>
> Regards,
> Mats


James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/