Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of fanli@amazon.com designates
 207.171.160.37 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Question regard to org.activemq.network.jms package
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:35:04 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <2A91A89941BD0B4CA56892C3806B3C0C322354@exchg-sea3-02.ant.amazon.com>
Thread-Topic: Question regard to org.activemq.network.jms package
Thread-Index: AcYs3kaftbz3LgAHQA+jM0sSddGECgAABTMQ
From: "Li, Fan" <fanli@amazon.com>
To: <activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org>

Thanks Rob=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdavies@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:27 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question regard to org.activemq.network.jms package

Hi Li,

your requested changes are in SVN head

cheers,

Rob

On 8 Feb 2006, at 17:31, Li, Fan wrote:

> Hi:
>
> I am wondering if it is possible to have a couple small changes made=20
> to the classes in the org.activemq.network.jms package. Right now the=20
> TopicBridge class has a protected JmsTopicConnector, which implements=20
> the method createReplyToTopicBridge. This means if I have another=20
> JmsConnector that needs to use TopicBridge; it has to inherit from=20
> JmsTopicConnector. And it is also a problem if my reply to bridge is=20
> not a TopicBridge. So I am wondering if it is okay to include a more=20
> general abstract method createReplyToBridge in the JmsConnector class=20
> and have all the subclasses to it implement this method, and make=20
> TopicBridge have a protected JmsConnector instead of=20
> JmsTopicConnector, so other subclass of JmsConnecor can also use=20
> TopicBridge. (The same goes for QueueBridge.)
>
> Thanks
> Fan Li
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:hiram@hiramchirino.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question regard to org.activemq.network.jms package
>
> Yes,
>
> And make sure that they use the Apache Copyright headers on them.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Li, Fan wrote:
>
>> Hi Hiram:
>>
>> What do I need to include in this patch? Just the source code for my=20
>> classes?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Fan Li
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:hiram@hiramchirino.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:12 AM
>> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Question regard to org.activemq.network.jms package
>>
>> Hi Fan,
>>
>> If you submit a patch, we would be glad to add them to the next=20
>> release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Li, Fan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> I am currently working on a project that would create a bridge that=20
>>> enables the communication of applications written using our=20
>>> messaging system to those applications written using ActiveMQ.  The=20
>>> ActiveMQ package org.activemq.network.jms provides most of the=20
>>> functionalities I needed in my project. However, I believe that=20
>>> ActiveMQ only provide foreign Topic to ActiveMQ Topic and foreign=20
>>> Queue to ActiveMQ Queue bridges, but my project has the need for=20
>>> Queue to Topic and Topic to Queue bridges. I am going to write my=20
>>> own classes for these, but I am wondering if ActiveMQ would provide=20
>>> these functionalities in the future.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Fan Li
>>>
>>>