ace-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre De Rop <pierre.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ace-Obr not using the latest repoindex version
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:49:19 GMT
Hi Bram,

I did not know that; thanks for the information.
So, is it planned to apply the patch to the latest repoindex (no rush for
me) ?

best regards;
/Pierre


On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Bram Pouwelse <bram@pouwelse.com> wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
>
> The latest version of repoindex is not a drop-in replacement for the
> current (really old) version that's used. Ace-obr supports non bundle
> artifacts in the repository which is not supported by repoindex, there is
> an open issue for this [1].
>
> Regards,
> Bram
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-447
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM Pierre De Rop <pierre.derop@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using the latest ace from the trunk, and I have an issue with
> ace-obr,
> > which is currently using an version of repo index
> > (org.osgi.impl.bundle.repoindex.lib-0.0.4.jar).
> >
> > I would like to know if it's possible to update the cnf/localrepo in
> order
> > to use the latest stable version of repoindex (which is currently
> > org.osgi.impl.bundle.repoindex.lib-3.2.0.jar if I'm correct) ?
> >
> > Indeed, I have some resolve errors under bndtools when using ace-obr and
> > the old repoindex, which seems to generate invalid requirements in the
> obr
> > index when you have some bundles with some DS components (I have a mix of
> > DM/DS components in my applications).
> >
> > thanks;
> >
> > cheers
> > /Pierre
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/bndtools/bndtools/issues/739
> > [2] https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/396
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message