ace-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Langel <>
Subject Re: [feedback] hurdles when working with ACE
Date Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:55:59 GMT
Hi Jan,

Thanks a lot. I see a lot of value in a solution such as Ace, 
But it needs to be maintained and there needs to be sufficient demand.

Here a few issues we faced and that created the following requirement
- Integration with persistence backend —> GIT/SQL db, so all ACE artifcats/settings/data
is properly stored 
- better documentation
- integration with BndTools
- best practices for entire SDLC 


On 1/22/16, 3:48 PM, "Jan Willem Janssen" <> wrote:

>Hi community,
>It has been very quiet the past couple of months on the development of ACE. I
>am currently busy with picking up the last issues we need to resolve in order
>to prepare a new release of ACE (which is long overdue already).
>After the release, we’d like to start working on improving ACE again. We know
>that ACE has several white spots that might impact its use for your use cases.
>Therefore, I’d love to hear your feedback on ACE: issues, abeyance's and
>hurdles you’ve come across and you like to see improved. Other ideas on what
>can be improved are welcome as well :)
>Thanks in advance,
>(cross posting to the dev@ list as well).
>Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
>+31 631 765 814
>My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
>Luminis Technologies
>Churchillplein 1
>7314 BZ  Apeldoorn
>+31 88 586 46 00
>KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
>BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01

View raw message