Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ace-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ace-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0614A18266 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23010 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2015 03:57:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ace-users-archive@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 22963 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2015 03:57:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@ace.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@ace.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 22951 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2015 03:57:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:57:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 91F80C01AB for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:57:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I48cv77ffcIT for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 93190206E3 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so71802141iof.0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:57:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Qvf5VXATh1OJm418bCXIe9NtKkFpxVGr6tx9t1jFQUo=; b=CO5qxwU9vbmi7xVhlkMjrVFNQSQ/zYX1PUttlhgjp+Um59NXm7JS4Wow7yQSSorsdS lPr++XPlqrKUQLU0/fTp5hvpt3v1rPbMcefWUxeG5BM74q91fnlFj0b3G8iqWcdgkgks ymgNFl688Bbdszsxz52hLGjqzZ9hMOVfTdc1e7PORK68jJNlBfeB53QPMP08xnFR5EFe 5tkMVBsAejd8S7qWhc9ZrVAzkRpjR5vjhpZHPrOrBOv+q18rpEkpXLhotuvnucYxUr9/ t8OnhuT+ZTdx//lRPluuVTgLYswNhywYwAvfQ69stYWxcAOFf0rG8+LkP9qm4TVBl+bk GoFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.152.75 with SMTP id a72mr10401810ioe.129.1443671864471; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.14.215 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.14.215 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:57:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:57:44 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance issues, logging, and relay server setup From: "Robert M. Mather" To: users@ace.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11409b68a774920521030c46 --001a11409b68a774920521030c46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sep 2, 2015 8:57 PM, "Karl Pietrzak" wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Robert M. Mather < > robert.mather.rmm@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We have about 200 targets running off ACE in production now, and as we add > > more, we're noticing a steady decline in performance of the web UI, > > especially the initial login. Also, occasionally the server seems to get > > caught in a loop or something and starts eating up CPU until we kill and > > restart it. After restart, it always seems to perform a bit better for a > > while, but the cycle continues. > > > > Is there some way we can get debug/logging output from the ACE server? That > > way we'd have a better sense of what's going on and we could report back > > with better information. > > > > Also, due to the performance issues and our need to continue expanding, > > we're considering setting up a relay server. We're running on the > > 'server-allinone' distribution at the moment, would we have to switch to > > the "componentized" version in order to configure for relay? > > > > Any other recommendations? > > > > Not sure if it matters, but our targets sync with ACE every 7 minutes. Is > > it possible the cost of that ping is starting to add up? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Is there a way for you to run on profiling (are you familiar with the > concept)? Even a little profiling data would be a huge help. Do you mean jvm profiling? I haven't worked with that, but could give in a try. By the way, our ace server crashed the other day for no apparent reason. It would be very helpful to capture log4j (or whatever logger ace uses) output to a file. Sorry for the delay in my reply, I didn't see your message when it arrived in by inbox for some reason. > > > -- > Karl --001a11409b68a774920521030c46--