Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ace-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ace-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEAC97761 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45451 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 18:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ace-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45421 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 18:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ace-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ace-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45413 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2011 18:10:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:02 +0000 Received: by yenl4 with SMTP id l4so2210439yen.6 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:09:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.88.135 with SMTP id bg7mr35909825igb.11.1322590180771; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:09:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.111.69 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:09:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:09:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects From: Toni Menzel To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9c25e8865f04b2e3851f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f3b9c25e8865f04b2e3851f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 still in process. Minor thing: the check script contains wrong keys location. Though the correct one is mentioned in the mail. Could i fix that in SVN within the release vote ? (i strongly think yes but better ask since this its very formal ) On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Marcel Offermans < marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote: > +1 > > Verified the signatures, built the full release from source, and validated > that the ACE server and target both work. Looks good! > > Greetings, Marcel > > -- Toni Menzel Source --e89a8f3b9c25e8865f04b2e3851f--