ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geert Schuring (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (ACE-129) Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
Date Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:21:38 GMT


Geert Schuring commented on ACE-129:

Sorry, my second comment was not a reaction to yours, it sounds real sarcastic this way and
that was not the intention. I wrote the second comment before your response to my first comment
was shown.

I understand that you want to keep in line with the naming convention used by other OSGI projects.
My only point is that this is not the maven convention. But because OSGi and Maven differ
on some points its ok for me to choose either one, as long as it's an explicit choice, and
not some workaround to make it easy to set the bundle symbolicname while the maven-bundle-plugin
does that correctly by default no mather which groupId/artifactId scheme we use.

Considering your comments I would like to suggest to use the artifactId you suggested, and
to remove the Bundle-SymbolicName instruction from the bnd config since the maven-bundle-plugin's
default value is equal to the artifactId you're going to use.

> Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ACE-129
>                 URL:
>             Project: Ace
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
> To be compliant with most OSGi projects, including Apache Felix, the artifactId of our
bundles should look like:
> groupId: org.apache.ace
> artifactId: org.apache.ace.client.automation
> Like this, we will be able to directly use the artifactId in the Bundle-SymbolicName
of the Felix maven-bundle-plugin.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message