ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (ACE-129) Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
Date Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:47:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999266#comment-12999266
] 

Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on ACE-129:
------------------------------------------

Sorry, but I'm not sure to follow you.

The OSGi naming convention is ${groupId}/${groupId}.${artifactId}.

For instance, if you go on the central repo, you will see:
org/osgi/org.osgi.core/4.2.0
org/osgi/org.osgi.compendium/4.2.0
org/apache/felix/framework/org.apache.felix.framework/3.0.8
org/apache/karaf/admin/org.apache.karaf.admin.core/2.1.3

My purpose is to use this naming convention for groupId/artifactId in ACE.
It's just to be consistent with other OSGi projects.

> Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACE-129
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129
>             Project: Ace
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> To be compliant with most OSGi projects, including Apache Felix, the artifactId of our
bundles should look like:
> groupId: org.apache.ace
> artifactId: org.apache.ace.client.automation
> Like this, we will be able to directly use the artifactId in the Bundle-SymbolicName
of the Felix maven-bundle-plugin.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

Mime
View raw message