Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ace-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13287 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 22:12:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 22:12:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 90433 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 22:13:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ace-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90394 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 22:13:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ace-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ace-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90386 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 22:13:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:13:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.109.24.36] (HELO smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:12:54 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.64] (planetmarrs.xs4all.nl [82.95.193.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA8MCNhl021385 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:12:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marcel.offermans@luminis.nl) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Gateway error when updating From: Marcel Offermans In-Reply-To: <9CCD09A4-7A6E-405B-8D12-719172338581@luminis.eu> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:12:22 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0AE91550-9F80-4DDD-A627-8690AD48A47B@luminis.eu> <9C8F4F13-B3E0-4CDA-B485-F605975530DF@luminis.eu> <9CCD09A4-7A6E-405B-8D12-719172338581@luminis.eu> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner On 8 Nov 2010, at 22:08 , Angelo van der Sijpt wrote: > On Nov 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Stephen Brady wrote: >=20 >> To clarify, the specific bundles that I've tested with all have = proper >> symbolic names in the manifest, and still getBundle is encountering = null >> symbolic names. I only referenced the possibility of a given bundle = not >> having a bundle symbolic name as something potentially to catch = before >> getting to getBundle (if this is not already being done). >=20 > Hm, that's interesting. Could you post the manifest of one of the = offending bundles, given that you can pinpoint one?) I have not looked at the problem in detail, but could this be a case = where the bundle's manifest is not the first thing in the jar file, = causing the call to getBundle() to ultimately fail? I guess having such = an offending bundle would reveal that. Greetings, Marcel