ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Siebert (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (ACE-97) Replace OBR implementation with Felix OBR
Date Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:02:13 GMT
Replace OBR implementation with Felix OBR
-----------------------------------------

                 Key: ACE-97
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-97
             Project: Ace
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 0.8.0, 1.0.0
            Reporter: Steve Siebert
            Priority: Minor


I have a need to have n OBRs available to the ACE provider, one of which will be one or more
Apache Archiva repositories.  In a previous thread, we discussed that the current ACE implementation
of the OBR services are tied to its implementation, so at a minimum the API would need to
be split from its implementation (purpose on that thread was a look at reusing the service
API to write a new store implementation for Archiva).  However, what is the general feeling
about looking at using the Felix OBR subproject to expose an "OBR federation" to ACE?  Basically
with this approach, we would gain some functionality in ACE and remove the need to maintain
the local implementation.  Also, given Felix's historical ties to RFC 112, ACE would be in
a better position to "convert" to the OBR specification once it is ratified by the OSGi group.

Thoughts?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message