Mailing-List: contact ace-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tonit.com@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=rqMLy3YFZpAsa1bcKlvgraNgV/bGQ14WOlT+zQvW7HpQM6iypLoC6CIleb8De2iyuy
         Hao9IyCJq8neK/F83CN69Z3lXVx+/t3OXrtRAXOpEx5aIw5vr5Qd+buVp2YAmO2JFEeo
         xK9rxZZk/znmhXZY2YPbwAxJBxwr3UCtWFegg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tonit.com@googlemail.com
In-Reply-To: <4E4A0041-7C46-4F38-8D28-557FDDE2C529@luminis.nl>
References: <d4c754d20912061059j70da780eta8feac7f1ab98ad0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6A4F64A8-382A-4AB4-9366-5C7A8E1196CE@luminis.nl>
	 <4B1C102E.5070007@nanthrax.net>
	 <ADF75D04-264D-45B5-9B97-B8533170A565@luminis.nl>
	 <d4c754d20912061400o48080758l91799f44aff2e8e3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20543B7E-F964-429A-A764-8314127EB0AC@luminis.nl>
	 <d4c754d20912070126y253856f2pe532902da18fa5f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4E4A0041-7C46-4F38-8D28-557FDDE2C529@luminis.nl>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:48:00 +0100
Message-ID: <d4c754d20912070148w570f0d9ei21ddaf38ae809892@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mavenization
From: Toni Menzel <toni@okidokiteam.com>
To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a6b26688ce047a205a7d

--001636c5a6b26688ce047a205a7d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

its pretty unrelated to the ACE-62 work, but having failing builds does not
sound good - so we should disable them.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:

> Technically, yes, we can mark such tests with an annotation to indicate
> they're broken. That will exclude them from being run.
>
> For now I'm fine with doing that, so if that helps you with the
> mavenization, feel free to do so. It's documented here (right at the
> bottom):
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ace/testing.html
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:26 , Toni Menzel wrote:
>
> > can we disable this build / or disable the test then ? Just to get the
> good
> > green back.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> > marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> To clarify, there are indeed a couple of integration tests that fail o=
n
> >> this Bamboo server. On my local machine, I have not yet been able to
> make
> >> them fail, nor have they failed in the past. This probably means there
> are a
> >> few race conditions in there somewhere.
> >>
> >> Greetings, Marcel
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 6, 2009, at 23:00 , Toni Menzel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Test failures in ant build (default) are somewhat "not reproducable "=
 ?
> >>> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/ACE-DEF
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> >>> marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I just had the same thought, and added the build to the existing
> Bamboo
> >>>> build (that was donated by Atlassian and is used by different (Apach=
e)
> >>>> projects). That way we have both the Ant and Maven builds in the sam=
e
> >>>> location. See ACE-64 for progress.
> >>>>
> >>>> Greetings, Marcel
> >>>>
> >>>> On Dec 6, 2009, at 21:12 , Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Marcel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a question concerning continuous integration.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I propose to create a continuous integration chain. At Apache we ca=
n
> >> use
> >>>> Continuum (that I currently use for AutoDeploy
> >>>> http://continuum.nanthrax.net) or Hudson (that we use on ServiceMix)=
.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Toni Menzel
> >>> Independent Software Developer
> >>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> >>> toni@okidokiteam.com
> >>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> >>> Participation Software.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toni Menzel
> > Independent Software Developer
> > Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> > toni@okidokiteam.com
> > http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> > Participation Software.
>
>


--=20
Toni Menzel
Independent Software Developer
Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
toni@okidokiteam.com
http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.

--001636c5a6b26688ce047a205a7d--