ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com>
Subject Re: Mavenization
Date Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:48:00 GMT
its pretty unrelated to the ACE-62 work, but having failing builds does not
sound good - so we should disable them.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:

> Technically, yes, we can mark such tests with an annotation to indicate
> they're broken. That will exclude them from being run.
>
> For now I'm fine with doing that, so if that helps you with the
> mavenization, feel free to do so. It's documented here (right at the
> bottom):
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ace/testing.html
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:26 , Toni Menzel wrote:
>
> > can we disable this build / or disable the test then ? Just to get the
> good
> > green back.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> > marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> To clarify, there are indeed a couple of integration tests that fail on
> >> this Bamboo server. On my local machine, I have not yet been able to
> make
> >> them fail, nor have they failed in the past. This probably means there
> are a
> >> few race conditions in there somewhere.
> >>
> >> Greetings, Marcel
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 6, 2009, at 23:00 , Toni Menzel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Test failures in ant build (default) are somewhat "not reproducable " ?
> >>> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/ACE-DEF
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> >>> marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I just had the same thought, and added the build to the existing
> Bamboo
> >>>> build (that was donated by Atlassian and is used by different (Apache)
> >>>> projects). That way we have both the Ant and Maven builds in the same
> >>>> location. See ACE-64 for progress.
> >>>>
> >>>> Greetings, Marcel
> >>>>
> >>>> On Dec 6, 2009, at 21:12 , Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Marcel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a question concerning continuous integration.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I propose to create a continuous integration chain. At Apache we
can
> >> use
> >>>> Continuum (that I currently use for AutoDeploy
> >>>> http://continuum.nanthrax.net) or Hudson (that we use on ServiceMix).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Toni Menzel
> >>> Independent Software Developer
> >>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> >>> toni@okidokiteam.com
> >>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> >>> Participation Software.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toni Menzel
> > Independent Software Developer
> > Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> > toni@okidokiteam.com
> > http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> > Participation Software.
>
>


-- 
Toni Menzel
Independent Software Developer
Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
toni@okidokiteam.com
http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message