ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Topping <topp...@codehaus.org>
Subject Re: Mavenization of o.a.a.util package
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:21:34 GMT
Never mind, I'm just not acclimated to the sources yet.  Thanks for  
bearing with me.  I'll stick to the tasks in Jira.

:B

On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Brian Topping wrote:

> Ok thanks for the clarification.
>
> As I sometimes do, I suspect that this may have been a case of good  
> intentions that were never needed.  In this case it may have worked  
> to our advantage that the util project was never fully realized.
>
> I am more comfortable with the change and am going to go ahead with  
> it.  We can always put it back if necessary.
>
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Toni Menzel wrote:
>
>> oh, yeah sorry brian, just saw what you are referring to in detail:
>> The util stuff to be included even if its not used. Yeah, that was  
>> a bit
>> strange. And do not fully understand.
>> For those cases i would not embed the util stuff at all.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Toni Menzel <toni@okidokiteam.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, this is somewhat related to the old story, to include api into
>>> implementation or not to include and import from its own bundle.
>>> Sure, util is not api, but i can somewhat understand the inclusion  
>>> of those
>>> to libs into the respective bundles. Also because they are just  
>>> two classes.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, let the community decide. (my vote is 0 here)
>>> Remember: This is not related to the maven convertion. Just what  
>>> to embed
>>> in the final bundles. (one line in osgi.bnd)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Brian Topping  
>>> <topping@codehaus.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> As I get into the tree, I notice that the util project contents  
>>>> (all two
>>>> files) are duplicated into every jar.  I can assume there's a  
>>>> good reason
>>>> that might have been desirable, but there's some havoc with Maven  
>>>> to do so.
>>>>
>>>> As I look through the dependencies on these two files, there are  
>>>> really
>>>> only calls to o.a.a.util.Codec from the ace-log project and calls  
>>>> to
>>>> o.a.a.util.VersionRange from the ace-client-repository-helper- 
>>>> bundle
>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>> Any reasons I'm not fully understanding to not move these to those
>>>> respective projects and doing away with the util project until we  
>>>> have a
>>>> stronger need for something like it in the future?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Brian
>>>>
>>>> p.s.  Sorry if this detail granularity is too small... just don't  
>>>> want to
>>>> make any stupid assumptions as I get started.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Toni Menzel
>>> Independent Software Developer
>>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
>>> toni@okidokiteam.com
>>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>>> Participation Software.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Toni Menzel
>> Independent Software Developer
>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
>> toni@okidokiteam.com
>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>> Participation Software.
>
>


Mime
View raw message