ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: Mavenization
Date Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:52:56 GMT
Agreed, for now, we can disable unit tests to focus on the build itself. 
The tests/itests scope could come later.

Regards
JB

Toni Menzel wrote:
> its pretty unrelated to the ACE-62 work, but having failing builds does not
> sound good - so we should disable them.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Marcel Offermans <
> marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Technically, yes, we can mark such tests with an annotation to indicate
>> they're broken. That will exclude them from being run.
>>
>> For now I'm fine with doing that, so if that helps you with the
>> mavenization, feel free to do so. It's documented here (right at the
>> bottom):
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ace/testing.html
>>
>> Greetings, Marcel
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:26 , Toni Menzel wrote:
>>
>>> can we disable this build / or disable the test then ? Just to get the
>> good
>>> green back.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Marcel Offermans <
>>> marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To clarify, there are indeed a couple of integration tests that fail on
>>>> this Bamboo server. On my local machine, I have not yet been able to
>> make
>>>> them fail, nor have they failed in the past. This probably means there
>> are a
>>>> few race conditions in there somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings, Marcel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 6, 2009, at 23:00 , Toni Menzel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Test failures in ant build (default) are somewhat "not reproducable "
?
>>>>> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/ACE-DEF
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Marcel Offermans <
>>>>> marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just had the same thought, and added the build to the existing
>> Bamboo
>>>>>> build (that was donated by Atlassian and is used by different (Apache)
>>>>>> projects). That way we have both the Ant and Maven builds in the
same
>>>>>> location. See ACE-64 for progress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings, Marcel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2009, at 21:12 , Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Marcel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a question concerning continuous integration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose to create a continuous integration chain. At Apache
we can
>>>> use
>>>>>> Continuum (that I currently use for AutoDeploy
>>>>>> http://continuum.nanthrax.net) or Hudson (that we use on ServiceMix).
>>>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Toni Menzel
>>>>> Independent Software Developer
>>>>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
>>>>> toni@okidokiteam.com
>>>>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>>>>> Participation Software.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Toni Menzel
>>> Independent Software Developer
>>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
>>> toni@okidokiteam.com
>>> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>>> Participation Software.
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message