Mailing-List: contact ace-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of karlpauls@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=kY7mRt2KBsbFkpeYCDynw2eE7A85e+qD+yTc2Q8VIFlqGetePNLGDSATbPeJGYcpmb
         xigPPazSpFGmd4Zb3d+FkqMryyLiMZBHhfjIzi8y92KZ0CSOiDar57PvFIesqMjVilQ4
         n9ERREtHsI3DWV25JXOf0+yO0U22PCOZd+uHQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d4c754d20911251050o7892f12es5f4ee6630ab1e1e3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A37DD09B-61BD-491B-9D15-28B36BF5D765@codehaus.org>
	 <AC20FEFE-05E4-4392-9084-10A4C0DF25F1@codehaus.org>
	 <d4c754d20911251050o7892f12es5f4ee6630ab1e1e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:37:30 +0100
Message-ID: <487a994c0911251137k139a3ccbqe90887842d054040@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Maven Ace
From: Karl Pauls <karlpauls@gmail.com>
To: ace-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Toni Menzel <toni@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> Looks like a good start. Actually i think one has to start and offer (at
> least) a clean maven based ACE Core build. Flat structure, one multimodul=
e
> pom. maven-bundle-plugin in place.
> Thoughts on GAV:
> GroupId: org.apache.ace
> ArtifactId: ace-core-repository (and accordingly)
> Version: 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> Why 0.8.0-SNASPHOT ? Ok, ace is not entirely new (many commerical
> deployments) + seeks a 1.0 with graduation (marcel, just thinking out of
> thin air to kickstart discussion). It does not really matter anyhow. Just=
 to
> have something.
>
> @Marcel: Are we going into trouble when working on this outside of apache
> first and contribute the whole thing (if apropriate and workable) ?
> Talking about IP Clearance and stuff.

Depends. If it is not too big a patch then attaching it to JIRA might
be enough. If there are several people working on it and it becomes a
substantial patch then we will need at least an icla (ccla if
applicable) and a grant from the people involved.

regards,

Karl

> Toni
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Brian Topping <topping@codehaus.org> wro=
te:
>
>> Oops, it appears that the existing Maven issue is regarding an integrati=
on
>> of the existing Ant script against the Maven repositories when I think w=
hat
>> we're after is a reconstruction of the build under Maven, without using =
Ant.
>>
>> I've started an issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-62, a=
nd
>> in agreement with Toni's suggestion, started a Github repository at
>> http://github.com/topping/Apache-Ace-Mavenization. =A0Jean-Baptiste, wou=
ld
>> you like to kick things off with your existing POM? =A0I suspect yours i=
s
>> further along than mine, and I don't want to frustrate your efforts by
>> checking mine in first.
>>
>> Cheers, Brian
>>
>>
>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
>>
>> =A0Hi gang,
>>>
>>> I've been speaking to Marcel for the couple weeks since ACUS about gett=
ing
>>> on board with a Maven build for Ace, it's great to see there's a comple=
te
>>> army of folks that also have the same idea!
>>>
>>> My analysis so far is probably not farther than Jean Baptiste's, but I
>>> would agree with Toni that we could start a github to get things going.=
 I'm
>>> suspecting that the folder moves that will be required are all going to=
 be
>>> easily practical after creating the POM(s).
>>>
>>> I'll move the discussion over to the Jira issue though.
>>>
>>> Cheers, B
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Toni Menzel
> Independent Software Developer
> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> toni@okidokiteam.com
> http://www.ops4j.org =A0 =A0 - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> Participation Software.
>


--=20
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com