ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Toni Menzel <>
Subject Re: Terminology
Date Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:44:28 GMT
+1 on artifact and feature, too.

And the oddest of all terms to me was "license", which i agree with Carsten,
distribution kind of makes sense to me in this context. A "assembly" to me
is more generic and does not tell that we assign a "target" already.
Distribution tells that we not "assemble" something but "distribute"
hope this was not too confusing ?

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <>wrote:

> Ok, so far I think we "agreed" to use artifact and feature.
> So the final term is "license" :)
> As suggestions we have "product", "distribution", "configuration",
> "assembly", "composition" (hope I did not overlook a proposal)
> The most neutral term would be "assembly", I guess. I personally like
> "distribution" in this context a little bit more, but "assembly" would
> be fine as well :)
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler

Toni Menzel
Independent Software Developer
Professional Profile:     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message