ace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Terminology
Date Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:53:18 GMT
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Toni Menzel <toni@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> +1 on artifact and feature, too.
>
> And the oddest of all terms to me was "license", which i agree with Carsten,
> distribution kind of makes sense to me in this context. A "assembly" to me
> is more generic and does not tell that we assign a "target" already.
> Distribution tells that we not "assemble" something but "distribute"
> something.

+1

regards,

Karl

> hope this was not too confusing ?
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Ok, so far I think we "agreed" to use artifact and feature.
>>
>> So the final term is "license" :)
>> As suggestions we have "product", "distribution", "configuration",
>> "assembly", "composition" (hope I did not overlook a proposal)
>>
>> The most neutral term would be "assembly", I guess. I personally like
>> "distribution" in this context a little bit more, but "assembly" would
>> be fine as well :)
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Toni Menzel
> Independent Software Developer
> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
> toni@okidokiteam.com
> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> Participation Software.
>



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message