Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7899DD685 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61651 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 14:56:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 60469 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 14:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@ace.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ace.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 60087 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:56:22 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:56:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bram de Kruijff (JIRA)" To: commits@ace.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACE-365) OBR non-bundle metadata has no symbolicname/version metadata MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13693096#comment-13693096 ] Bram de Kruijff commented on ACE-365: ------------------------------------- Comitted in r1496498. > OBR non-bundle metadata has no symbolicname/version metadata > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ACE-365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-365 > Project: ACE > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.0.0 > Reporter: Bram de Kruijff > Assignee: Bram de Kruijff > > Although the ACE OBR support uploading non-bundle resources based on the filename := -. heuristic, this metadata is not reflected in the respository.xml index. Infact it only species the resource.uri. > As a result it is impossible to find these resources by querying the repository in a sensible way, such as using a requirement with an osgi.identity= filter directive. > Therefore, I suggest to at least add the resource.symbolicname and resource.version to the current implementation. This is in line with R5 where every resource will have an osgi.identity and osgi.content namespace capability. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira