Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE3F8EA70 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97068 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2013 12:44:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ace-commits-archive@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 96948 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2013 12:44:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@ace.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ace.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@ace.apache.org Received: (qmail 96819 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2013 12:44:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:44:13 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:44:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Marcel Offermans (JIRA)" To: commits@ace.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (ACE-97) Replace OBR implementation with Felix OBR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Offermans updated ACE-97: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.8.0-incubator) > Replace OBR implementation with Felix OBR > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: ACE-97 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-97 > Project: ACE > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OBR > Reporter: Steve Siebert > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 3h > Remaining Estimate: 3h > > I have a need to have n OBRs available to the ACE provider, one of which will be one or more Apache Archiva repositories. In a previous thread, we discussed that the current ACE implementation of the OBR services are tied to its implementation, so at a minimum the API would need to be split from its implementation (purpose on that thread was a look at reusing the service API to write a new store implementation for Archiva). However, what is the general feeling about looking at using the Felix OBR subproject to expose an "OBR federation" to ACE? Basically with this approach, we would gain some functionality in ACE and remove the need to maintain the local implementation. Also, given Felix's historical ties to RFC 112, ACE would be in a better position to "convert" to the OBR specification once it is ratified by the OSGi group. > Thoughts? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira