From user-return-7475-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@accumulo.apache.org Thu Aug 29 18:03:57 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A06F180608 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 35098 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2019 18:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35089 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2019 18:03:56 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:03:56 +0000 Received: from hw13390.local (pool-173-69-177-211.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [173.69.177.211]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8AE7B597B for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server To: user@accumulo.apache.org References: <12324C6E-C4DF-4124-A2F0-551B6FBA64B3@contoso.com> <9901D035-82FC-4E2F-B186-721FE39B6062@bah.com> From: Josh Elser Message-ID: <06e877ae-128b-12bc-8fef-235e07f89356@apache.org> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:03:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/69.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9901D035-82FC-4E2F-B186-721FE39B6062@bah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Architectural interest in the feature/product is a very different thing than interest in maintaining and testing said product ;) I read Christopher's reply in a "there isn't interest in contributing more to the service by the current, active developers" tone, in the spirit of ASF's "do-oracy" approach. We would be very welcome for people to come along and do more with it and separating it from the core repository helps individuals see the fruits of their labor much more quickly. https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html On 8/29/19 11:57 AM, Roberts, Geoffry [USA] wrote: > I am surprised to learn that there apparently is scant interest in > proxy.  I think it is attractive to support multiple languages.  From my > view, the well-being of Accumulo depends on it.  Maybe I am wrong. > > *From: *Christopher > *Reply-To: *"user@accumulo.apache.org" > *Date: *Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:31 AM > *To: *accumulo-user > *Subject: *[External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server > > It was separated out so it could live or die on its own, as the case may > be. It hasn't received much development attention in awhile. > > A new version hasn't yet been released from this new repo. If there is > still interest, somebody will need to devote some resources to attend to > it. One thing I'd like to see is for it to drop the multi user aspect, > and to support a single user via the new 2.0 client properties. It could > be simplified greatly that way, and possibly easier to maintain, if > there's still interest. > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 10:25 Mike Miller > wrote: > > Yes it has been pulled from the main Accumulo 2.0 repository.  The > proxy is now in its own repo here: > https://github.com/apache/accumulo-proxy > > > It should still work the same. > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:17 AM Roberts, Geoffry [USA] > > wrote: > > I hope this is a quick question. > > I downloaded a copy of Accumulo 2.0 and noticed it does not > contain proxy.properties.  Has it been removed?  Will it work > with an older version of the file? >