accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <>
Subject Re: [External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server
Date Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:03:56 GMT
Architectural interest in the feature/product is a very different thing 
than interest in maintaining and testing said product ;)

I read Christopher's reply in a "there isn't interest in contributing 
more to the service by the current, active developers" tone, in the 
spirit of ASF's "do-oracy" approach. We would be very welcome for people 
to come along and do more with it and separating it from the core 
repository helps individuals see the fruits of their labor much more 

On 8/29/19 11:57 AM, Roberts, Geoffry [USA] wrote:
> I am surprised to learn that there apparently is scant interest in 
> proxy.  I think it is attractive to support multiple languages.  From my 
> view, the well-being of Accumulo depends on it.  Maybe I am wrong.
> *From: *Christopher <>
> *Reply-To: *"" <>
> *Date: *Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:31 AM
> *To: *accumulo-user <>
> *Subject: *[External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server
> It was separated out so it could live or die on its own, as the case may 
> be. It hasn't received much development attention in awhile.
> A new version hasn't yet been released from this new repo. If there is 
> still interest, somebody will need to devote some resources to attend to 
> it. One thing I'd like to see is for it to drop the multi user aspect, 
> and to support a single user via the new 2.0 client properties. It could 
> be simplified greatly that way, and possibly easier to maintain, if 
> there's still interest.
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 10:25 Mike Miller < 
> <>> wrote:
>     Yes it has been pulled from the main Accumulo 2.0 repository.  The
>     proxy is now in its own repo here:
>     <>
>     It should still work the same.
>     On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:17 AM Roberts, Geoffry [USA]
>     < <>> wrote:
>         I hope this is a quick question.
>         I downloaded a copy of Accumulo 2.0 and noticed it does not
>         contain  Has it been removed?  Will it work
>         with an older version of the file?

View raw message