Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <56DA0827.6080600@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:11:51 -0500
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@accumulo.apache.org
CC: dev <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 1.6 Javadoc missing classes
References: <066a01d17658$bc9dc1b0$35d94510$@bbn.com>
 <56D9F827.4090103@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9YqSG96XkE4vOH=QZsvOyP355woaGULShV7D_i-S7+skA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL5zq9YqSG96XkE4vOH=QZsvOyP355woaGULShV7D_i-S7+skA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Maybe the distributed tracing APIs?

Christopher wrote:
> Sure, we can include that. Are there any other classes which would be
> good to have javadocs for which aren't public API?
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:03 PM Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com
> <mailto:josh.elser@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Good catch, Dan. Thanks for letting us know. Moving this one over to the
>     dev list to discuss further.
>
>     Christopher, looks like it might also be good to include iterator
>     javadocs despite not being in public API (interfaces, and
>     o.a.a.c.i.user?).
>
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: 1.6 Javadoc missing classes
>     Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:59:26 -0500
>     From: Dan Blum <dblum@bbn.com <mailto:dblum@bbn.com>>
>     Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>
>     To: <user@accumulo.apache.org <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>>
>
>     A lot of classes seem to have gone missing from
>     http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/apidocs/ - SortedKeyValueIterator
>     would be an
>     obvious example.
>