Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BE6F17654 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8397 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 15:46:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8346 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 15:46:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8333 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2015 15:46:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B9CFAC6944 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoNKq0OSYlQP for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (PACDCMHOUT01.cable.comcast.com [68.87.31.167]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DD7504543A for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:51 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 44571fa7-f79216d000002c77-70-555f4f4d7323 Received: from pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com (dlpemail-wc-1p.sys.comcast.net [24.40.12.146]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id B3.D6.11383.D4F4F555; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.1.189]) by pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3d40:bdea:7266:7f5a%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:46:20 -0400 From: "Fagan, Michael" To: "user@accumulo.apache.org" Subject: Re: Accumulo Cluster Sizing Thread-Topic: Accumulo Cluster Sizing Thread-Index: AQHQlJti2no8QbdShkuoGngcTPIRW52IWGQA//+pwAA= Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:46:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555F4344.1070200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555F4344.1070200@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.191.124.142] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9BBDFE8E34364749920500DD47B71CA3@cable.comcast.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Forward X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprDIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiocEzSdfXPz7UYP5cTYv1O44wOzB6TNt0 nTGAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr49Stb4wF19kqmhc3MjYwLmXtYuTkkBAwkXg2q5EZwhaTuHBv PVsXIxeHkMA2Jonb3f/YIZxDjBLPLu0Gq2ITsJD483wiE4gtImAp8XLBLjBbWEBF4vHJk0A1 HEBxVYmHzRYQJVYSX9dfBAuzAIUvrcoGCfMKWEvc2X4DrFNIIEqiZ+85NhCbU0BT4vLUTkYQ mxHonu+n1oDVMAuIS9x6Mp8J4k4BiSV7zkPdLCrx8vE/qF+UJd6vucMIUa8jsWD3JzaQtcwC DhKHJtdDhLUlli18zQxxgqDEyZlPWCBaxSUOH9nBOoFRfBaSbbOQTJqFMGkWkkmzkExawMi6 ilGuIDE5JTk3I7+0xMBQLzkxKSdVLzk/NzmxuAREb2IExplLuPzyHYz3XjgdYhTgYFTi4W3z iA8VYk0sK67MBQY1B7OSCK+uH1CINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I475FfsaFCAumJJanZ qakFqUUwWSYOTqkGxjzXEpk+2QM+J/dFHBG5eXXDpObfSnz3/be6+vGc8PhVo3pskbp4D/+B E1wVE5dHOKikhn2Xjvx8ojj4xcl8ph8Gjm3/n4grPzCaJlIhPUP/XenGzW4Pfu95883sw65U lmslf+c4L72Yw24tuDZ5m1Wrz4xTTWd/Xgt4wrtWb/3hPToWousYFZRYijMSDbWYi4oTAXCV 8cWvAgAA Josh, Thanks, I would like use my performance requirements to derive my HW requirements. For example: assume I have a raw 7TB dataset representing 500 million records with the expectation of 500K-1000K key fetches a day. I remember there was a tuning webpage circulating around a several years back to help figure the HW sizing to meet performance benchmarks. =20 Regards, Mike Fagan On 5/22/15, 8:55 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: >Hi Mike, > >We have some info in >http://accumulo.apache.org/1.7/accumulo_user_manual.html#_hardware > >What's missing there? Let us know the types of questions you have and we >can expand on the document. > >- Josh > >Fagan, Michael wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can someone point me to recommendations regarding cluster sizing? >> >> Regards, >> Mike Fagan >> >> >