Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C4910AC0 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29821 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2015 15:31:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29772 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2015 15:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 29762 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2015 15:31:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:31:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.177] (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (209.85.223.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:31:28 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id rd18so19442364iec.8 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:31:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=m/q8qT5YN9c4opzDARTA3G9yKeDgs+6hcBL+93jRph8=; b=MHYhBbLLiRtYd2GNCOrEFjL8aKdZy1D3zxtLiP5qk0ZR0zWTVyOlwS08J9Yh9U4fG4 cmEabS65MIeftf5XSpC9eqMrj4awmzGf6PhrVoE5U87j6GpOEQW4j5jgTeAE17nVCBgZ fEYypbvoTMg4r8j9wNPFm7ue7LAxuapkCFLFqhQb27qcUIhGWDTR7XIjQEx4ckBEFElk LPOdMDRy9ZO/eJvfSuvvOmoTTXGQHNT+Ib69WX6y2czU/ZjdBXVrrrfYYRZlFDe0JezY zt7kU9bWV3rVK80P7xaSnrWnADo90BxjKFn/nQ4472xnQf0PjBCc28ktRzK7oVMYccRT y5Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2/WtjqLNF54xIONjtNazL4u2EEj5cGBO3iAvlWlKsPw2wR5dkHhZrHkSYBDHAyDzRqDGJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.25.74 with SMTP id 71mr20433955ioz.70.1420903866183; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:31:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: webmaster@webmaster.ms Received: by 10.43.87.19 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:31:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:31:05 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3SzI5YrCI1Mjp5G7WF61m3aIYfw Message-ID: Subject: Offline tables on adding a tserver (Accumulo 1.6 regression?) From: Denis To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi I recently upgraded my Accumulo cluster from 1.4 to 1.6 and noticed a regression. Removing a tserver makes puts some tablets offline for a while until other tservers start handling them, that's normal. But with 1.6 the same happens on adding a tserver as well. Is it ok?