accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis <de...@camfex.cz>
Subject Re: Offline tables on adding a tserver (Accumulo 1.6 regression?)
Date Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:40:15 GMT
Sometimes it left unbalanced with new tserver hosts zero tablets or
much less that others.
So I had to restart master to initiate the balancing process.
Then balancing was performed slowly without putting thousands of
tablets offline.

On 1/11/15, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:
> I have a hunch that the 1.4 version being used possibly had one or more of
> the many bugs regarding balancing getting 'stuck', which was typically
> resolved via bouncing the master. Denis, in 1.4 when you brought you
> tserver back online, did you find that things were then balanced or did you
> just have a tserver up and things were left unbalanced?
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Denis <denis@camfex.cz> wrote:
>
>> yes, per server
>>
>> On 1/11/15, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Denis <denis@camfex.cz> wrote:
>> > On 1/10/15, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> ...
>> >
>> >> 3) how many tablets do you have per server?....
>> >
>> > 3. about 6000
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Just to confirm, this is 6000 tablets per-server and not 6000 tablets
>> > per-table or overall, right?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sean
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message