accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC2
Date Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:49:34 GMT
Another issue: the stated SHA1 does not match. The commit actually appears
to be: 03a3d18b9150fe7f42f024bbc0589c61609b5522
It looks like what happened was simply that you pushed the commit to bump
to 1.6.3-SNAPSHOT onto the rc2 branch accidentally.


--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Also, -1 due to the problems Sean identified.
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> Corey, I'm really sorry for the churn. I thought I ran both forward and
>> backward compatibility modes last time (-old 1.6.1 -new 1.6.2 as well as
>> -old 1.6.2 -new 1.6.1), but I must have just eyeballed the output of the
>> 1.6.1 -> 1.6.2 report for problems with forward compatibility.
>>
>> I ran things again this time (as a formality) and the 1.6.2 -> 1.6.1
>> check turned up 2 issues.
>>
>> 1) minicluster.ServerType added enum members
>>
>> Specifically TRACER and MONITOR. This changes the public API because
>> ServerType is in it, and a client built against 1.6.2 could refer to these
>> enum values and then get a NoSuchFieldError if they try to go back to
>> 1.6.1. This only shows up as a low severity "other" issue in the 1.6.1 ->
>> 1.6.2 check, which is probably why I didn't see it.
>>
>> 2) core.client.mapreduce.AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration(JobContext)
>> changed from package-private to public
>>
>> This causes the method to show up as a new part of the public API. This
>> issue only shows up in the 1.6.2 -> 1.6.1 check below.
>>
>>
>> Here are the specific report outputs for others to look:
>>
>> * 1.6.0 -> 1.6.2 (added things are fine, because the change might be from
>> 1.6.0 -> 1.6.1)
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~busbey/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>> * 1.6.1 -> 1.6.2 (nothing should be added, but it's easier to just pay
>> attention to the next one)
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~busbey/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>> * 1.6.2 -> 1.6.1 (under a semver patch increment, this should be just as
>> strong an assertion as the reverse)
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~busbey/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>   Devs,
>>>
>>>     Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
>>>
>>>     Branch: 1.6.2-rc2
>>>     SHA1: 34987b4c8b4d896bbf2d26be8e70f70976614c0f
>>>     Staging Repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1020/
>>>
>>>     Source tarball:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1020/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
>>>     Binary tarball:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1020/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
>>>     (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
>>> a given artifact.)
>>>
>>>     Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>>>
>>>     Over 1.6.1, we have 140 issues resolved
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=26bdc0373cbbc26ef148db46c0a2cd638cb8c2b4;hb=1.6.2-rc2
>>>
>>>     Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
>>>
>>>     The vote will be extended as a result of the weekend and will be
>>> open until Tuesday, January 28th 12:00AM UTC (1/27 8:00PM ET, 1/27 5:00PM
>>> PT)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sean
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message