accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: OpenTSDB
Date Mon, 12 May 2014 00:11:31 GMT
I've started looking at something like this for the major read/write APIs
for HBase and Accumulo in Kite.

One difference is that I'd prefer to eventually get to a common API that
can be backed by either HBase 0.98+ or Accumulo.

-- 
Sean
On May 11, 2014 6:34 PM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please define "hbase commands".
>
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Donald Miner <dminer@clearedgeit.com>wrote:
>
>> Crazy/bad idea I've had before.... we could develop a hbase->accumulo
>> proxy that receives basic hbase commands and then writes out accumulo.
>>
>> On May 11, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It is being maintained.  I have tried very hard not to modify the core
>> OpenTSDB to support it.  But, it would be nice if we could define a
>> storage-independent layer to which it could adhere.
>>
>> I don't believe the OTSDB team is interested, but a basic scalable
>> back-end abstraction would be nice.  As would a standard java build
>> environment, but that doesn't seem to be wanted, either.
>>
>> We could work towards a common storage abstraction, which would be a
>> reasonable request.
>>
>> Zipkin does a good job of being storage independent.  I would work
>> towards their model.
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>> On May 11, 2014 10:28 AM, "Arshak Navruzyan" <arshakn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed Eric Newton's opentsdb adapter for Accumulo.  Is this still
>>> being maintained?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ericnewton/accumulo-opentsdb
>>>
>>> Also wondering if the StumbleUpon folks are willing to merge it in as an
>>> alternative to HBase back end.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Arshak
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message