accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Memory tables?
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:24:02 GMT
Are you seeing a performance issue that you need to resolve?


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Diego Woitasen <diego@woitasen.com.ar>wrote:

> Hi,
>  I was looking at the documentation but I couldn't find the answer. Is
> there a way to configure tables to be served from memory?
>
> I've been thinking about different options, not sure what's available:
>
> 1- Memory tables clustered? So, if a node dies we don't lost the data.
> 2- Backed to disk, but always served from memory.
> 3- Is it possible to configure it table by table?
>
> Because for some tables we want high throughtput, so if we can set a
> flag for a table to be served from memory would be great.
>
> Regards,
>    Diego
>
> --
> Diego Woitasen
> - Linux and Open Source solutions architect
> - DevOps Engineer, Infrastructure developer
> http://www.woitasen.com.ar
>

Mime
View raw message