accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Embedded Mutations: Is this kind of thing done?
Date Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:40:53 GMT
If the sub-document changes, you'll need to search the values of every
Accumulo entry?


On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Geoffry Roberts <threadedblue@gmail.com>wrote:

> The use case is, I am walking a complex object graph and persisting what I
> find there.  Said object graph in my case is always EMF (eclipse modeling
> framework) compliant.  An EMF graph can have in if references to--brace
> yourself--a non-cross document containment reference.  When using Mongo,
> these were persisted as a DBObject embedded into a containing DBObject.
>  I'm trying to decide whether I want to follow suit.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you describe the use case more? Do you know what the purpose for the
>> embedded changes are?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Geoffry Roberts <threadedblue@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I am in the throws of converting some(else's) code from MongoDB to
>>> Accumulo.  I am seeing a situation where one DBObject if being embedded
>>> into another DBObject.  I see that Mutation supports a method called
>>> getRow()  that returns a byte array.  I gather I can use this to achieve a
>>> similar result if I were so inclined.
>>>
>>> Am I so inclined?  i.e. Is this the way we do things in Accumulo?
>>>
>>> DBObject, roughly speaking, is Mongo's counterpart to Mutation.
>>>
>>> Thanks mucho
>>>
>>> --
>>> There are ways and there are ways,
>>>
>>> Geoffry Roberts
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sean
>>
>
>
>
> --
> There are ways and there are ways,
>
> Geoffry Roberts
>

Mime
View raw message