accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Memory tables?
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:32:31 GMT
I made https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1015 quite a while 
back, but I don't know of anyone looking at implementing it yet.

On 4/23/14, 8:29 AM, Eric Newton wrote:
> The only option available today is to increase the size of the data
> block cache and enable it for your table.  Assuming your table is
> accessed frequently, it will be served almost always from the cache.
> This is done for the metadata table, for example.
>
> Of course, it will be backed by HDFS and replication.
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Diego Woitasen <diego@woitasen.com.ar
> <mailto:diego@woitasen.com.ar>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>       I was looking at the documentation but I couldn't find the answer. Is
>     there a way to configure tables to be served from memory?
>
>     I've been thinking about different options, not sure what's available:
>
>     1- Memory tables clustered? So, if a node dies we don't lost the data.
>     2- Backed to disk, but always served from memory.
>     3- Is it possible to configure it table by table?
>
>     Because for some tables we want high throughtput, so if we can set a
>     flag for a table to be served from memory would be great.
>
>     Regards,
>         Diego
>
>     --
>     Diego Woitasen
>     - Linux and Open Source solutions architect
>     - DevOps Engineer, Infrastructure developer
>     http://www.woitasen.com.ar
>
>

Mime
View raw message