accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Accumulo and OSGi
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:51:36 GMT
I'd love to see us move to slf4j. Hadoop is in the middle of a proposal 
about this too which sounds good to me.

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCA%2B4kjVv7N2dRR5rmdFHCpBx-K3yT7YRLs0Dvrvdjsn3iChUsEA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

On 4/23/14, 10:33 AM, Geoffry Roberts wrote:
> If I were to pitch in on this,  how would it work?  and what logger?  Do
> I submit patches?  Is slf4j the target?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com
> <mailto:busbey@cloudera.com>> wrote:
>
>     yes, there are also some bits using commons-logging. I think we
>     managed to scrub out java.util.logging.
>
>
>     On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Geoffry Roberts
>     <threadedblue@gmail.com <mailto:threadedblue@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         I thought I'd check in.
>
>         After some encouragement from this group, I found some time and
>         now have an Accumulo client running in OSGi (Felix).  It's
>         rather primitive, at this juncture, in that it is little more
>         than a wrap job.  I was, however, forced to hack Zookeeper to
>         get things to work.  Zookeeper needed to import an additional
>         package.  I used the servicemix bundle for Hadoop.
>
>         Josh, You asked if there was anything that could be done
>         upstream to make osgification go better.  One thing, and it's
>         not a huge deal, but getting everything on the same logging
>         library would be nice.  So far, I see both log4j and slf4j.  Are
>         there more?
>
>
>
>         On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Russ Weeks
>         <rweeks@newbrightidea.com <mailto:rweeks@newbrightidea.com>> wrote:
>
>             On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Geoffry Roberts
>             <threadedblue@gmail.com <mailto:threadedblue@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 You say the community would be well-accepting of
>                 bundling up the Accumulo client.  If that's the case,
>                 I'd like to hear from them.
>
>
>             +1!
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         There are ways and there are ways,
>
>         Geoffry Roberts
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Sean
>
>
>
>
> --
> There are ways and there are ways,
>
> Geoffry Roberts

Mime
View raw message