Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1503100B7 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 983 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 04:49:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 719 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 04:49:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 711 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2013 04:49:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:49:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.128.180] (HELO mail-ve0-f180.google.com) (209.85.128.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:49:33 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f180.google.com with SMTP id pb11so260836veb.11 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:48:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KYd6AFoYU7s+sw0zfk8O0uWONTwxt0nira+hnPWRSL0=; b=gj+qvQn8OHLS9Hrl06k9Rvs5yWJBYWvnvGPRoSOv57cFMeL7rXlGfdsfFavQ4MOwZO 4vLLHbmo2jryNwFuqJd1OzrSW0CnJ/YXAAuHDJrNjQ92glKm5FY4TFuYNkfLUsfZhr+S +j68hktBCTR7RRgUzgqWWQSXjFdXB1tMe7bNR0Aa//zdNyFYn0qlBdegnmh049A0+PN+ JNBFP4yVkz8+tWHjjlVncQcRaU9fP36fS8XCWy+9x2yx0gRiRWNhfmsX9JKzX2+qP13Q 324UP/f5IMl4LRuH8MbACxN+WRypBBZaadg1EC013/V7x3jRV2avSrmlEU9U9kMrc3ap BZ4A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNQf2vKb+QgtddT3uOTgVOIodpCVAhANhfQcVz/Yl1m/5+93S/18kxBbj48eZnzf9hKMGq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.69.142 with SMTP id e14mr10430126vdu.29.1376542131887; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.40.69 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:48:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <24070BEF0A3F684489AA943FD3439EF2058102AB7F@CARRXM06.drn.mil.au> References: <24070BEF0A3F684489AA943FD3439EF2058102AB7B@CARRXM06.drn.mil.au> <24070BEF0A3F684489AA943FD3439EF2058102AB7F@CARRXM06.drn.mil.au> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:48:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Two locations for the same extent [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] From: Keith Turner To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c7f4ca33ad04e3f5301b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3071c7f4ca33ad04e3f5301b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Killing the two tablet servers may clear it up. On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Dickson, Matt MR < matt.dickson@defence.gov.au> wrote: > ** > > *UNOFFICIAL* > We are running 1.5.1. I found the duplicate definition in the !METADATA > table, should it be deteled from there? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Keith Turner [mailto:keith@deenlo.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, 15 August 2013 13:23 > *To:* user@accumulo.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Two locations for the same extent [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] > > what version of Accumulo are you running? > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dickson, Matt MR < > matt.dickson@defence.gov.au> wrote: > >> ** >> >> *UNOFFICIAL* >> >> Hi, >> >> We have had several tablet servers die recently while doing splits and >> since restarting we are getting a 'found two locations for the same extent >> ....' . I noticed ACCUMULO-1243 addresses the bug that creates this, >> however I just wanted to know how I can fix the two locations for the >> extent. Do I delete one of them or merge them? How do I identify the >> extents? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Matt Dickson >> >> > --20cf3071c7f4ca33ad04e3f5301b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Killing the two tablet servers may clear it up.


On Thu, Aug 15, 20= 13 at 12:39 AM, Dickson, Matt MR <matt.dickson@defence.gov.au> wrote:

UNOFFICIAL

We are running 1.5.1.=A0 I found the duplicate definition=20 in the !METADATA table, should it be deteled from there?

From: Keith Turner [mailto:
keith@deenlo.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, 15 August 2013 13:23
To:=20 user@accumulo= .apache.org
Subject: Re: Two locations for the same=20 extent [SEC=3DUNOFFICIAL]

what version of Accumulo are you running?


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dickson, Matt M= R <matt.dickson@defence.gov.au> wrote:

UNOFFICIAL<= /font>

Hi,
=A0
We have had several tablet servers die = recently=20 while doing splits and since restarting we are getting a 'found two= =20 locations for the same extent ....'=A0.=A0 I noticed ACCUMULO-1243= =20 addresses the bug that creates this, however I just wanted to know how = I can=20 fix the two locations for the extent.=A0 Do I delete one of them or mer= ge=20 them?=A0 How do I identify the extents?
=A0
Thanks in advance,
Matt=20 Dickson

=

--20cf3071c7f4ca33ad04e3f5301b--