Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33D0810029 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 23:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1612 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 23:47:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 1567 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 23:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 1557 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2013 23:47:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 23:47:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.48] (HELO mail-qe0-f48.google.com) (209.85.128.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 23:47:41 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 9so1510271qea.35 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LkbzN9u/6V8NAssd9wiaEjn9dbjVbwPWomCXnPj5+hI=; b=pzh9FVsb6hGhHnbssCz12PZQk8fgXkybOct2jMcPhI5cZxSJMU3LHLhBpsS+M2UACm rs1IR+FJh1MEYX9kqnUWuy3UyiQeMIowJCz47AgM/9KSROZvJkRZjf5GL4F/H14/tXuO Gkwd1TTmPoM4YFAdHMyyxqqmn2vBirCveC5WZQi6hklb1PNMrIZIuZ9B3U/zBHgxHqSU vHi/DvrQ/QwFo4Wrf+L3rM+naLv0Bzm5zHtW+I29Sqa7XL5heVuIwsZatF+q8xypB70E gdBNhZrIMQzK+cxm8S8D66NCAO3Od+lTzA/t/MhSx9/2WVB3ooHIoluXIMQCerU1sqMO uK/g== X-Received: by 10.229.208.6 with SMTP id ga6mr2677780qcb.151.1368056841069; Wed, 08 May 2013 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.210] (pool-173-69-170-178.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.69.170.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hs4sm845503qeb.8.2013.05.08.16.47.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 May 2013 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <518AE41F.4030603@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 19:47:43 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130422 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: Accumulo / Hadoop version compatibility matrix References: <518AC617.4090805@gmail.com> <518AE17C.9000103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You're fine. You may have to rebuild Accumulo from source, that's all. It will be rather obvious to you when you visit the monitor: if you get a NoSuchMethodException regarding NetUtils, you'll need to rebuild. If that is the case, we can work with you to get you the necessary pom changes. On 05/08/2013 07:44 PM, Terry P. wrote: > Uh oh ... I saw in the README that Accumulo 1.4.2 had been tested with > Hadoop 0.20.2, which is the version found in CDH3u5. I didn't see > anything that called out issues with CDH3u4+ in the README (in fact > neither Cloudera nor cdh are found in the readme anywhere). > > So I'm running Accumulo 1.4.2 on CDH3u5 on an 8-node cluster which I > was intending to deliver as a Dev environment this Friday. I did not > build Accumulo, I'm using the binary distribution. > > One reason I chose cdh3u5 was because it's "approved" FOSS software. > No Hadoop 1.1.x is approved (yet), and our approval chain is lengthy. > > Did I just make a colossal error? What exactly "doesn't work" with > cdh3u4+? How bad of shape am I in? Data loss bad? > > -tp > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Josh Elser > wrote: > > In regards to a released 1.4, you're right, Billie. My bad. > > I think I pulled back the necessary changes to 1.4 from 1.5 at > some point... I don't think I did commit that though. Oops. > > On 05/08/2013 06:51 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Josh Elser > > >> > wrote: > > "It does NOT work against... " these versions without building > Accumulo against those specific artifacts. > > I know for sure that you can run against CDH3u4+ if you build > Accumulo yourself and provide the necessary options (I > think this > is written down; if not, we need to remedy that). I assume the > same to be true for 0.23 and 2. > > > Josh, are you referring to 1.5 or 1.4 here? Building 1.4 > against different versions of Hadoop would require modifying > the poms. > > Billie > > > > On 5/8/13 5:34 PM, John Vines wrote: > > For Accumulo 1.4.x we have compatibility with Hadoop > 0.20.x - > hadoop-1.1.x, CDH3u1-3, MapR, and all current releases > of HDP. It > does NOT work against CDH3u4+, CDH4.x, hadoop 0.23.x, > and hadoop 2+. > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Mike Hugo > > >> > wrote: > > I'm looking for guidance on what versions of > Hadoop will work > with Accumulo 1.4.3. I checked the user manual > and aside > from indicating that HDFS and Zookeeper are > required, it > doesn't contain compatible versions. > > In particular, I'm interested to know if Accumulo > 1.4.3 will > work with Hadoop 1.1.2 > > Does a version compatibility list exist somewhere? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > >