Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62FB1FB44 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66773 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2013 03:54:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66483 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2013 03:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66421 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2013 03:54:53 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:54:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username ctubbsii, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:54:53 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tp5so6845159ieb.36 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:54:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.170.36 with SMTP id aj4mr6110361igc.4.1364442892468; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.171.19 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:54:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5153AFF6.7020109@gmail.com> References: <5140C760.9010901@gmail.com> <51454592.5070309@gmail.com> <5153A7E6.4040004@gmail.com> <5153AFF6.7020109@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:54:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] accumulo-1.4.3 RC2 From: Christopher To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I was wondering if we should maybe start doing release announcements on the Apache announcements mailing list. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Just clicking the button to actually move it from unreleased to released ;) > > It happily glared red at me telling me that 3/18/2013 had already passed. > > > On 03/27/2013 10:43 PM, Eric Newton wrote: >> >> I provided a release date for it today. Is there some other action that >> is required? >> >> -Eric >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Josh Elser > > wrote: >> >> Just noticed that 1.4.3 hadn't been "released" on Jira. I took the >> liberty of doing so. >> >> >> On 03/18/2013 03:56 PM, Eric Newton wrote: >> >> VOTE passes with +3 >> >> The maven repo has been promoted to release. >> The artifacts have been added to the svn release repo. >> The tag was copied from 1.4.3rc2 to 1.4.3. >> The release candidate tags have been removed. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Josh Elser >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> Keith, I remember something similar, but I still have no >> idea why >> that should make any difference... >> >> Overall +1 for 1.4.3 RC2 as a 1.4.3 release >> >> Good >> * Checksums good (dist and src) >> * Sigs good (dist and src) >> * Tag builds and deploys with example conf >> * Ran functional tests and continuous ingest >> * Javadoc and source jars built in dist >> * License header check work on Linux >> >> Not good/could be better >> * Cross-ref CHANGES to Jira: CHANGES has no reference to >> ACCUMULO-1170 (fixed in 1.4.3) >> * RAT check is still busted in OSX >> * One bundled presentation needs fixing (same as >> previously mentioned) >> * Noticed we don't build developer manual with releases, >> only user >> manual >> * Said developer manual still says version1.3 >> >> >> On 03/13/2013 03:13 PM, Keith Turner wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:07 PM, John Vines >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> My rat check did not have those 2 odp files. >> >> It seems like there was difference when running the >> check on >> Mac vs >> Linux. But maybe not, its been a while. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Josh Elser >> > > >> >> wrote: >> >> I'm failing the rat:check, finding 55 files >> without >> licenses instead of >> 53. Eric (anyone who doesn't fail the >> rat:check), can >> you cross-reference, >> please? [1] >> >> Also, test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp >> needs to be >> updated. >> >> Still poking around... >> >> [1] >> !????? CHANGES >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/native-standalone/gc >> !????? >> conf/examples/1GB/native-standalone/masters >> !????? >> conf/examples/1GB/native-standalone/monitor >> !????? >> conf/examples/1GB/native-standalone/slaves >> !????? >> conf/examples/1GB/native-standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/standalone/gc >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/standalone/masters >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/standalone/monitor >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/standalone/slaves >> !????? conf/examples/1GB/standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/native-standalone/gc >> !????? >> conf/examples/2GB/native-standalone/masters >> !????? >> conf/examples/2GB/native-standalone/monitor >> !????? >> conf/examples/2GB/native-standalone/slaves >> !????? >> conf/examples/2GB/native-standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/standalone/gc >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/standalone/masters >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/standalone/monitor >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/standalone/slaves >> !????? conf/examples/2GB/standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/native-standalone/gc >> !????? >> conf/examples/3GB/native-standalone/masters >> !????? >> conf/examples/3GB/native-standalone/monitor >> !????? >> conf/examples/3GB/native-standalone/slaves >> !????? >> conf/examples/3GB/native-standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/standalone/gc >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/standalone/masters >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/standalone/monitor >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/standalone/slaves >> !????? conf/examples/3GB/standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/native-standalone/gc >> !????? >> conf/examples/512MB/native-standalone/masters >> !????? >> conf/examples/512MB/native-standalone/monitor >> !????? >> conf/examples/512MB/native-standalone/slaves >> !????? >> conf/examples/512MB/native-standalone/tracers >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/standalone/gc >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/standalone/masters >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/standalone/monitor >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/standalone/slaves >> !????? conf/examples/512MB/standalone/tracers >> !????? >> docs/src/developer_manual/component_docs.odp >> !????? src/packages/deb/accumulo/conffile >> !????? test/system/auto/simple/__init__.py >> !????? test/system/auto/stress/__init__.py >> !????? test/system/bench/lib/fastsplits >> !????? test/system/bench/lib/mediumsplits >> !????? test/system/bench/lib/slowsplits >> !????? test/system/bench/lib/splits >> !????? >> test/system/continuous/batch_walkers.txt.example >> !????? >> test/system/continuous/ingesters.txt.example >> !????? test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp >> !????? >> test/system/continuous/scanners.txt.example >> !????? >> test/system/continuous/walkers.txt.example >> !????? >> test/system/randomwalk/conf/walkers.example >> >> >> On 3/13/13 2:02 PM, Eric Newton wrote: >> >> Please vote on releasing the following >> candidate as >> Apache Accumulo >> version 1.4.3. >> >> In this release candidate: >> >> * fix for ACCUMULO-1170 >> * javadocs in release artifact >> * fix for ACCUMULO-1173 >> >> The src tar ball was generated by exporting: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/tags/1.4.3rc2 >> >> To build the dist tar ball from the source, >> run the >> following command: >> src/assemble/build.sh >> >> Tarballs, checksums, signatures: >> http://people.apache.org/~ecn/1.4.3rc2 >> >> >> >> >> Maven Staged Repository: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-006 >> >> Keys: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> Changes: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/tags/1.4.3rc2/CHANGES >> >> The vote will be held open for the next 72 hours. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >