Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E647E435 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10500 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 18:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10443 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 18:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10433 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2013 18:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cypris87@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.178] (HELO mail-ve0-f178.google.com) (209.85.128.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:16:37 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id oz10so1638801veb.37 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:16:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1fKPAfXwdyjagusDmwBpFvsZ/9ggtQCygdkM/yXcccg=; b=PthLyWBoGQ5AbD07fcifso+nrQ7gMecTKLyaW18Mqm+kNQlfn5c7qnWs4F0qu+wHkd nJM9biLB49UiuxUgAldcUtCzUS8l2Ce5yMqjLFQPgMPEN8q3F8r9nlC2yyQry9crGXIq DvqZznNjXKNNlcvPtDLKeW/q9CpmhrELW4DzscW/AR1ZixX+HrvaquPSy/0ntLTxsSkq 8gxW61K/HrZP07lh+0yhGZpVAt6Hn5AXFvxRu4brsxe0AXAYAPdIS2CeZ7qym3GlMzad jj2jPLTh4feGWBjPEZfBTUndslNBnLewRZz5zZBRB20lDUb7F/aFXtbT9bxiRJtwkZrW AaLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.11.205 with SMTP id pf13mr2870648vcb.70.1359051376725; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.3.79 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:16:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:16:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Retrieving 0 rows from Accumulo using Pig From: Chris Sigman To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Right, but since the rows don't have any auth's applied, and I'm not passing any to the call to AccumuloStorage in Pig, Pig shouldn't have an issue finding anything, should it? Or should I have auths on the data and pass an auth into the LOAD statement? -- Chris On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > The shell will use all of a user's auths if none are provided, as a > convenience. > > -Eric > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Chris Sigman wrote: >> >> A little more info in case it helps, I'm connecting using the same >> user (root) as the data was inserted with. I can't imagine this, but >> there aren't potentially any issues because there aren't any auths on >> anything? I can scan the data just fine, so I'm rather befuddled by >> it. >> >> -- >> Chris >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Chris Sigman wrote: >> > No, I don't think so. The first couple dozen rows at least don't have >> > any auths set. >> > >> > -- >> > Chris >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Medinets >> > wrote: >> >> could it be a visibility issue? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Chris Sigman >> >> wrote: >> >>> when pig executes the job, it shows 0 rows loaded from the table > >