Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 802A0E33D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7980 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 17:50:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 7942 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 17:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 7934 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2013 17:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:50:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eric.newton@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:50:36 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x8so99285wey.20 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:50:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OQqi2wFGNWrgKNppwuqWtKNMHaWpR2x+ucQ7p80gDGI=; b=AV+8WwDdTjh6a8ATa8EPAOZ0pof2koL2wkSMzB4S32Cje4Qjjy+vbRGDnKKn8MKXCj ImVA03MVOf1yGlC1dvbJdPidmEYZm1/LRXH+J4LQBHZqmvqz6wGiVJ9Hfo7mnoJT/Cal RFJMatN7V6K7GXI8SJvu93vxZT4il7qZTQhlg2KZNUvBAi7ZzDkQrEETwlTngl2OPZmz DcYbWxst5Vt6lQfc8mEZt9ErnpCpfq7CzFPcu56GP9/aS527FnAqGsMfgzM/GXAOjuey uzBKjwWyQVAQdMXdRw/ZPZdRUlnjArDs377BoldF9SgfwQQcYcxpfOdM8yO0v/yrkppa tDoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.82.69 with SMTP id g5mr4768979wiy.21.1359049815444; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.233.33 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:50:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Retrieving 0 rows from Accumulo using Pig From: Eric Newton To: "user@accumulo.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442838a7b4e5504d40c71c5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0442838a7b4e5504d40c71c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The shell will use all of a user's auths if none are provided, as a convenience. -Eric On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Chris Sigman wrote: > A little more info in case it helps, I'm connecting using the same > user (root) as the data was inserted with. I can't imagine this, but > there aren't potentially any issues because there aren't any auths on > anything? I can scan the data just fine, so I'm rather befuddled by > it. > > -- > Chris > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Chris Sigman wrote: > > No, I don't think so. The first couple dozen rows at least don't have > > any auths set. > > > > -- > > Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Medinets > > wrote: > >> could it be a visibility issue? > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Chris Sigman > wrote: > >>> when pig executes the job, it shows 0 rows loaded from the table > --f46d0442838a7b4e5504d40c71c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The shell will use all of a user's auths if none are p= rovided, as a convenience.

-Eric


On Thu, Jan 24, 201= 3 at 12:40 PM, Chris Sigman <cypris87@gmail.com> wrote:
A little more info in case it helps, I'm= connecting using the same
user (root) as the data was inserted with. =A0I can't imagine this, but=
there aren't potentially any issues because there aren't any auths = on
anything? I can scan the data just fine, so I'm rather befuddled by
it.

--
Chris


On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Chris Sigman <cypris87@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, I don't think so. The first couple dozen rows at least don'= ;t have
> any auths set.
>
> --
> Chris
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Medinets
> <david.medinets@gmail.c= om> wrote:
>> could it be a visibility issue?
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Chris Sigman <cypris87@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> when pig executes the job, it shows 0 rows loaded from the tab= le

--f46d0442838a7b4e5504d40c71c5--