Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJRvFdqTSa84NVKGUbVAWFeUSxJg3=BxjHKBLZft=_VxicuxNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8981F843EE8088488986AB76F63A790313E02090@endeavour.eoir.com>
	<CADxc9Bk2LC_uX0c3SiDcygGF-mr1O_uxt3swYFsyCp+2iQRxTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOiJXP5LRhEzO4bLEyWWTXAoOb9NyOK2DGFWaRWZrgF+T9PG+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJRvFdqTSa84NVKGUbVAWFeUSxJg3=BxjHKBLZft=_VxicuxNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:32:45 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAL5zq9akkRRj23yvZm5zjJ8Ueto+fBdkTzEK7242rAbTErcT5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concurrent updates
From: Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii@gmail.com>
To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If you're going to only do aggregation at the scan scope, you'd
probably want to make sure you don't have the versioning iterator
turned on for minc and majc scopes. Otherwise, you're scans may look
different over time between initial ingest and later, when the data
has been compacted on disk.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> One option is to only set the aggregation for scan scope, and then you can
> programatically choose which one you need.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, David Medinets <david.medinets@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Accumulo also supports a very specific kind of update which is very
>> > helpful in the case of sums and aggregates.
>>
>> I'll ask the obvious follow-up question. If two kinds of sums are
>> needed (i.e., summing by day and week), would an event need to be
>> written to two tables?
>
>