Return-Path: 
 <user-return-1040-apmail-accumulo-user-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68CB9DC43
	for <apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 54105 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 21:04:02 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54079 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 21:04:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54070 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2012 21:04:02 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:04:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jwellington.moreno@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.41] (HELO mail-pb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:03:54 +0000
Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so12198714pbb.0
        for <user@accumulo.apache.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=o+t5kbBupulJmbNAK2bXu2wjqx57d2wtiw+nx1Jv+ss=;
        b=fNLW8yny+0bWq3wxTfNRRSP7lC1YLzGeRpXPddHkXmIHcj0sgKtPafIksoojQowL8U
         QD80MyS8a6mNz3sD4VszX2FfqjLoNt4jXRrfECR1nViOzOYKj3RoFVpUi6NPKkrFJsIX
         f3l2U4yZJUHMKjCuYXG2pD8LuIfDvLRur3WTcsf8j0dZcGfCEAF/UGSIZ7/YwsCu8+LP
         yhI6JoGyGPHJW0VTW6KUobLKh73WyUBQyI86zmujRp3MR1vgN7ovlCUX9OGB8i7awN4k
         I7xAQCNJ7k47YZSUqZkBK19iYElKzKS1EdD4+MkKk4Q1TdclwiDhozmfD+YABVipJID8
         Mu8A==
Received: by 10.68.238.135 with SMTP id vk7mr84844pbc.80.1342472613358; Mon,
 16 Jul 2012 14:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.209.20 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Juan Moreno <jwellington.moreno@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:02:52 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAE1AbEurNtr5J=EHu88Mwsr7Oj_Jg5PKh8qbq91ux1eBw9ddGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Chain Jobs and Accumulo.
To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33cf703d6d0604c4f8c3f5

--047d7b33cf703d6d0604c4f8c3f5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi there, I have a use case where I need to use a Chain Mapper and/or
Reducer. The problem is that
the AccumuloInputFormat extends hadoop.mapreduce.InputFormat rather than
implementing hadoop.mapred.InputFormat

Trying to make use of *org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.ChainMapper*
does not work because it requires the use of the mapred package. Is there a
version of the AccumuloInputFormat which uses
the hadoop.mapred package instead? Can InputFormatBase be rewritten with
the newer API?

Thanks!
Juan

--047d7b33cf703d6d0604c4f8c3f5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi there, I have a use case where I need to use a Chain Mapper and/or Reduc=
er. The problem is that
<div>the AccumuloInputFormat extends hadoop.mapreduce.InputFormat rather th=
an implementing hadoop.mapred.InputFormat</div><div><br></div><div>Trying t=
o make use of=A0<b>org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.ChainMapper</b></div><div>

does not work because it requires the use of the mapred package. Is there a=
 version of the AccumuloInputFormat which uses</div><div>the hadoop.mapred =
package instead? Can InputFormatBase be rewritten with the newer API?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div>Juan</div>

--047d7b33cf703d6d0604c4f8c3f5--