Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E0A796B6 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89449 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 17:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 89415 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 17:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 89407 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2012 17:01:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:01:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.112.75.238] (HELO iron-ugovb-out.osis.gov) (206.112.75.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:00:55 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAAIN+0+sEAbx/2dsb2JhbABFt26BD4IgAQEEAX4LCwQBBg0uIhMFHQcSiAe7eIJBiH+GDAOVNpMA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,553,1336363200"; d="scan'208";a="163635" Received: from ghost-a.center.osis.gov (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) ([172.16.6.241]) by iron-ugovb-in.osis.gov with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 09 Jul 2012 12:58:07 -0400 Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so8911923vbk.0 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.95.225 with SMTP id dn1mr155395vdb.99.1341853230850; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.37.73 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:00:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1950524697.34063.1341852920064.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> References: <4FFB09FE.8030402@ccri.com> <1950524697.34063.1341852920064.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> From: John Vines Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:00:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WholeRowIterator, BatchScanner, and fetchColumnFamily don't play well together? To: user@accumulo.apache.org, john.armstrong@ccri.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f34d02a61e004c4688d47 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f34d02a61e004c4688d47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We have an open bug report about how Mock handles the reuse of Values. I'm wondering if perhaps there is a conflict there with BatchScanner in the same vain. More likely though, it's probably a case of BatchScanner behaving like a Scanner in Mock due to the non-distributed nature of Mock. I'm not really sure how we could expand the MockAccumulo framework to be MockParallel though. John On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, John Armstrong wrote: > On 07/09/2012 12:42 PM, John Armstrong wrote: > >> I've run across an unexpected behavior when using WholeRowIterator on a >> BatchScanner. >> > > addendum: This does not seem to happen when using the MockCloudbase > framework, so it didn't show up in my unit tests. If this is intentional > behavior, MockCloudbase should probably behave the same way as the real > thing, no? > --20cf307f34d02a61e004c4688d47 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have an open bug report about how Mock handles the reuse of Values. I= 9;m wondering if perhaps there is a conflict there with BatchScanner in the= same vain. More likely though, it's probably a case of BatchScanner be= having like a Scanner in Mock due to the non-distributed nature of Mock. I&= #39;m not really sure how we could expand the MockAccumulo framework to be = MockParallel though.

John

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM,= John Armstrong <jrja@ccri.com> wrote:
On 07/09/2012 12:42 PM, John Armstrong wrote:
I've run across an unexpected behavior when using WholeRowIterator on a=
BatchScanner.

addendum: This does not seem to happen when using the MockCloudbase framewo= rk, so it didn't show up in my unit tests. =A0If this is intentional be= havior, MockCloudbase should probably behave the same way as the real thing= , no?

--20cf307f34d02a61e004c4688d47--