Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of klucar@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
References: 
 <2063567445.98782.1342793375542.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov>
 <CADczPYT3dnFyv=EjQAb+bp-eLPgj4y3jgp_26Xcy_D==uJx_WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGp11bCq0VFPPhXXcM9=81tDHrV-0vCE2GJbuG9aFZrwSDPnGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jim Klucar <klucar@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGp11bCq0VFPPhXXcM9=81tDHrV-0vCE2GJbuG9aFZrwSDPnGg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:56:19 -0400
Message-ID: <-5383456894181038284@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: Titan (graph database) Support For Accumulo?
To: "user@accumulo.apache.org" <user@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

We are looking at using Titan also. The developers have a lot of
experience developing graph databases, so I expect good things.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Jenkins <jer.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm currently using accumulo, and have been looking at Titan.  So, I
> definitely have interest in both the integration as well as the
> rationale behind "...he wasn't very impressed with Titan".
>
> Does anyone have any further information as to why?
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:16 AM, John Vines <john.w.vines@ugov.gov> wrote:
>> I had spoken with Jason last week, as he made the ticket for it (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-638 ). I don't want to
>> misquote him, but the short of it was that he doesn't think Titan is needing
>> of Accumulo integration currently so he was planning on dropping it.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Medinets <david.medinets@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I recall hearing someone at the July OSSI meeting that Titan could
>>> read information from Accumulo tables. Does anyone here know if that
>>> support is standard in Titan?
>>
>>