Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A814965B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56729 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2012 22:50:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56695 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2012 22:50:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56687 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2012 22:50:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:50:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of steven.troxell@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.169] (HELO mail-gg0-f169.google.com) (209.85.161.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:50:12 +0000 Received: by ggm4 with SMTP id 4so4695559ggm.0 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=81wqxUN0fk3i7qbb9B4nOy+uQu9zcgxQBTc/oVI4c/Q=; b=M7q3Y4QpLUKzbLRRCyBTjUCpuqvIj8jyZcEsw/Pg64jIqu8B5qOGQAObipio+ElMpy nwpHOiV6fLINjQq5rDinanEjnUjOJ9FnQnYpl9ukIZtCuAvMJKXjNceXB4zB7uKmGMUt 3QUlZSXHYElsviJ7r9jBb8sTL8Ss+5Aax4s+3dNI7DebhW6DgOsF/DxIsiOS+Aql9ux1 YqOiQtk/4mTxbPiykpgEjykPHuMrwdNgG0E6+nI/xKx21diHpGWsp+fP4mM38aQZEuXc IROCGDhxG46DGvqqx3NMmJJdLzQLUq9UR7sLauwnkyC6hAYsTSO4V+7P468JtfWqxR12 AN/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.6.163 with SMTP id c3mr7691006oea.27.1339541391999; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.92.7 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:49:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:49:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Accumulo on EC2: How to specify zookeeper servers. From: Steven Troxell To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f838b5bd500ec04c24e48b6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f838b5bd500ec04c24e48b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry edit to last post, was proposing the idea of moving zookeeper off EC2. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Steven Troxell wrote: > Hi all, > > If anyone has experience with Accumulo on Ec2, and can help me out, I'd > greatly appreciate it. > > I have a client application that requires only a zookeeper server config > entry to connect to accumulo. Set to "localhost" on my personal box this > works fine. It seems fairly well-documented ( > http://search-hadoop.com/m/sPdqNFAwyg2 for example) that zookeeper and > EC2 do not play nice. I've tried some of the proposed solutions such as > using internal Ec2 hostnames in the zookeeper server config entry all to > still get the connection refused issues. > > > Moving my client into EC2 does not seem to be a viable option, because I > have so far been unsuccessful utilizing the ruby net/https to interact with > it. I get obscure SSL errors when trying to connect from EC2 to > localhost, and Connection reset by peer when trying to connect from > outside EC2. > > My question is, does anyone have a working example of how to specify > Zookeeper instances/servers for Ec2? Alternativley, would it make more > sense to move accumulo off EC2, and point Accumulo towards it instead? Or > would this likely run into the same problem, cause at some point, zookeeper > would then need to connect in to EC2 to accumulo? > > Thanks in advance for any/all help. > > > --e89a8f838b5bd500ec04c24e48b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry edit to last post,=A0 was proposing the idea of moving zookeeper off = EC2.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Steven = Troxell <steven.troxell@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

If anyone = has experience with Accumulo on Ec2, and can help me out, I'd greatly a= ppreciate it.

I have a client application that requires only a zookeeper server confi= g entry to connect to accumulo.=A0 Set to "localhost" on my perso= nal box this works fine.=A0=A0=A0 It seems fairly well-documented (http://search= -hadoop.com/m/sPdqNFAwyg2 for example)=A0 that zookeeper and EC2 do not= play nice.=A0=A0 I've tried some of the proposed solutions such as usi= ng internal Ec2 hostnames in the zookeeper server config entry all to still= get the connection refused issues.=A0


Moving my client into EC2 does not seem to be a viable option, beca= use I have so far been unsuccessful utilizing the ruby net/https to interac= t with it.=A0 I get obscure SSL errors when trying to connect from EC2 to l= ocalhost,=A0 and Connection reset by peer when trying to connect from outsi= de EC2.

My question is, does anyone have a working example of how to specify Zo= okeeper instances/servers for Ec2?=A0 Alternativley, would it make more sen= se to move accumulo off EC2, and point Accumulo towards it instead?=A0 Or w= ould this likely run into the same problem, cause at some point, zookeeper = would then need to connect in to EC2 to accumulo?

Thanks in advance for any/all help.



--e89a8f838b5bd500ec04c24e48b6--