Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 096259C56 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58449 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 17:49:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58418 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 17:49:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58407 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2012 17:49:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:49:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.112.75.239] (HELO iron-u-b-out.osis.gov) (206.112.75.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:49:21 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoEAAD0zE+sEAbx/2dsb2JhbABEtCaBD4IYAQEEAX4LCwQBBg0uIhMFHRmIBrZsixGCeoMWA5UbknI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,714,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="9191955" Received: from ghost-a.center.osis.gov (HELO mail-pb0-f41.google.com) ([172.16.6.241]) by iron-u-b-in.osis.gov with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 04 Jun 2012 13:45:49 -0400 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so6597037pbb.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.202.130 with SMTP id ki2mr42440903pbc.52.1338832135578; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.44.106 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1458480274.152403.1338830584221.JavaMail.root@linzimmb03o.imo.intelink.gov> References: <0A8F66C42F49E448A40E99946404EE5B75D43E28AF@aplesstar.dom1.jhuapl.edu> <1458480274.152403.1338830584221.JavaMail.root@linzimmb03o.imo.intelink.gov> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:48:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Software used for benchmarking a cloud From: Adam Fuchs To: user@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15abb7dae46604c1a9255a --047d7b15abb7dae46604c1a9255a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Graph-500 (http://www.graph500.org/) also has a benchmark that can be adapted to Accumulo. That will test random I/O with non-uniform distribution better than Tera-sort or continuous-ingest, but it's a bit more effort to get it working. Adam On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > Tera-sort is good. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Hider, Sandy > wrote: > > All, > > > > I am wondering what others have found to help perform benchmarks of a > > cloud? Have others found any open source software for this or rolled > their > > own? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > Sandy > > > > > --047d7b15abb7dae46604c1a9255a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Graph-500 (http://www.graph500.org/) also has a benchmark that can be adapted to Accumulo. That will test ran= dom I/O with non-uniform distribution better than Tera-sort or continuous-i= ngest, but it's a bit more effort to get it working.

Adam


On Mon, Ju= n 4, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:<= br>
Tera-sort is good.

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Hider, Sandy <Sandy.Hider@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> All,
>
> I am wondering what others have found to help perform benchmarks of a<= br> > cloud?=A0 Have others found any open source software for this or rolle= d their
> own?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Sandy
>
>

--047d7b15abb7dae46604c1a9255a--