Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <0A8F66C42F49E448A40E99946404EE5B75CBCFA529@aplesstar.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
References: 
 <656770667.364411.1333462669334.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov>
	<CADczPYQTsVwtLW4Sw68t=iOcOeJx6UqReyB2wzKqV5wc51oz_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<0A8F66C42F49E448A40E99946404EE5B75CBCFA529@aplesstar.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:37:19 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGUtCHrbdVp7uQV9yLq3HXPb8FxwNDjDg09J=Wbd_pxBQRagbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Navtive libs in accumulo source
From: Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com>
To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It falls back to a java implemention.  The java implementation is
slower, less memory efficient, and can incur the wrath of the Java GC.

Keith

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Hider, Sandy <Sandy.Hider@jhuapl.edu> wrot=
e:
> So if the native libs are not required, did I need to do anything else af=
ter
> seeing that loading error in the error log or did it fall back automatica=
lly
> to another map?
>
>
>
> Sandy
>
>
>
>
>
> From: John Vines [mailto:john.w.vines@ugov.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 10:27 AM
> To: user@accumulo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Navtive libs in accumulo source
>
>
>
> They are not required, but you get better performance by using the native
> maps. You can build them by going to $ACCUMULO_HOME/src/server/src/main/c=
++/
> and run make.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Hider, Sandy <Sandy.Hider@jhuapl.edu>
> wrote:
>
> I am using Accumulo 1.4 rc5 which I checked out and compiled.=A0 After
> installing on our cloud, the tserver logs were showing an error loading t=
he
> native libraries, =A0I do not recall which now.=A0 However when I checked=
 my
> accumulo version it did not even have an lib/native directory.
>
>
>
> I was able to find and use the native dir under the Binary distribution o=
f
> 1.3.5 but now I am wondering how should I have acquired the native files?
> Did I miss a step when compiling?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Sandy
>
>