Return-Path: 
 <user-return-622-apmail-accumulo-user-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D54999307
	for <apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 68859 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 15:26:21 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68838 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 15:26:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68829 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2012 15:26:21 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:26:21 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qc0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.216.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:26:14 +0000
Received: by qcsd16 with SMTP id d16so723705qcs.0
        for <user@accumulo.apache.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=Pt8Itcw/aeyqmIHQbHcHYqenUhbYp4sAA91nkWb6sIs=;
        b=Dy34Biv55/ckpIG/2nzM9GEbGzUtHWMZ/6khvFD+3KcCt6byJOl56xS1hzxRokhiuN
         Yh/5HmG4rHqYopLPam5q30LIevJ8LLK9+C+9x2rqbnUvG6N0Tkv0AQLGkT2oxg6evZ6g
         M+Xt5m+STtbpcBJbMfROBd5PsvkQoJ/NJEL8cYBYxfagxO+oNuLbPOavVKr4D6s0Z9Yg
         H7wc4/ijxEP/Foat+iz+xVtqk+yCtdtzQpPKb2tXsHhTqsjzFu6JoOexDz9xzZ+hsV3i
         oySDpxwbj5hRlGrTe48P5JpG4gJ1+VUgXWsavJGBnSCHZr9rBEmdrK/ox2bXdQYIbXoS
         qhhA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.137.79 with SMTP id v15mr2573417qct.142.1334157953260;
 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.161.208 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOiJXP4smr+6Loga3PL5E_eW4simN9+S5zoHjyNwaPcXWcCWHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOiJXP4smr+6Loga3PL5E_eW4simN9+S5zoHjyNwaPcXWcCWHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:53 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGUtCHoTXAOTOm5p_swumMVew5nDpAEf2ZPBSvS5YGqPWx74Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is There Procedure to Upgrade Accumulo in Working Cluster?
From: Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com>
To: user@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQm7aEMBj6J9FNEHj0ocxHtwu3F8amm7/159JBw1sZNOwQ/GvakTM1txkExS1YmH0XLrG3Of

Has anyone looked into Ambari?  I have been curious about this, but
have not looked into in detail.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, David Medinets
<david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's say that my cluster grows beyond the size where it is acceptable
> to manually upgrade from v1.4 to v1.5. Is there a process to automate
> the upgrade? Is the manual process documented?