Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACE499206 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41407 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-user-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41389 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41381 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41377 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of toddstavish@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:09:25 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so5739612obq.6 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:09:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=K7uP4WP8ewD24MwLnHTTt00nHKkSRp/hMwxyqSRb/aU=; b=U4E4mZFZQVyS8zcMZTNx+qS3jP65Wf2v3WbrESuIZUvQDv/t+wlOvXRsmhPifSVNIj H2TI1uSWmudv3VRX58Oh/z+JD270ZbrVUUfA/mVHmw4r/dUpagnrLqm+Iaj81ZmDe4kM t2B84amhXwC1iJ4kYHjvTn3Q+5TSijJsBDqTbrBKF2vz125PvKzJ1stfE7gMkE7IlVky 3W51AwTw5qmNJ4SqiyoutBZ82XmV3IPLF1npQP/gr3EJT4qH2/fVzqqHqnccTqCQ5ejn 0W6jCoOWx1soxRT/LsgNdQVI9VkO3pLdhcCirTfhrls3CZTPAuDOEeENmFxlPilfO+iq gwzQ== Received: by 10.182.154.5 with SMTP id vk5mr28793492obb.24.1332781743946; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:09:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.38.200 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:08:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Stavish Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:08:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Accumulo On MapR To: accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jason, > Did you gather any performance numbers? A comparison is the end goal. I am in the planning stages and could use some guidance. > If so, how did it compare to HDFS? And are there any plans to try it on a larger cluster (I'm assuming you were working with one VM). Yes, so far, I have deployed MapR\Accumulo to a single VM using accumulo shell as a smoke test. My plan is to run it in multinode testing on EC2. I saw a good write-up on accumulodata.com that describes setting up cloudera to run in EC2. 1. How many nodes should I run to have it be a meaningful test? 2. RC5 seems to have some memory allocation \ config issues. Wait for RC6? 3. Is /test/system/continuous sufficient to test? The MapR guys have offered to allow me to test on real hardware. So we could have an EC2 comparison against real servers as well. Also, Mapr has a Whirr setup. Trying to figure out if I should create one for accumulo too? -Todd