accumulo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Trost <jason.tr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Accumulo On MapR
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:33:22 GMT
Todd,

I think a comparison of the performance between MapR and HDFS on 10-20
nodes would be good enough unless you have more nodes available.  If you
could test on real hardware that would be ideal IMO, but EC2 would be fine.
 I look forward to hearing your results.

Thanks,

--Jason

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Todd Stavish <toddstavish@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 1. How many nodes should I run to have it be a meaningful test?
>>
>
> We test on 1, 10, and ~100 node clusters.
>
>
>> 2. RC5 seems to have some memory allocation \ config issues. Wait for RC6?
>>
>
> RC6 is now available.
>
>
>> 3. Is /test/system/continuous sufficient to test?
>>
>
> Yes.  It will collect performance numbers for you over time, too.
>
>
>> The MapR guys have offered to allow me to test on real hardware. So we
>> could have an EC2 comparison against real servers as well. Also, Mapr
>> has a Whirr setup. Trying to figure out if I should create one for
>> accumulo too?
>
>
> That would be great!
>
> -Eric
>

Mime
View raw message